Non-pneumatic Tire Wheel Disk Rim Thickness Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Non-pneumatic tires lack the responsiveness and comfort characteristics of pneumatic tires, particularly during turning, which affects the driving experience and user comfort.

Innovation Solution

A non-pneumatic tire design featuring a cylindrical tread part, a wheel part with a disk and rim structure where the disk's average thickness is greater than the rim's, and a spoke part with internal and external rings and radial spokes, allowing for improved flexibility and responsiveness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If the disk part is made thinner to reduce weight, then the weight decreases, but the responsiveness during turns deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight of non-pneumatic tireVSAvoidresponsiveness during turns
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The wheel part employs varying thickness distribution: the disk part has a first thickness while the rim part has a second thickness that is 0.5 to 1.5 times the first thickness. This local variation in thickness provides different stiffness characteristics to different regions, allowing the disk part to remain relatively thin for weight reduction while the rim part compensates for stiffness to maintain turn responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Speed

If the disk part is made thicker to improve turn responsiveness, then the responsiveness improves, but the weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponsiveness during turnsVSAvoidweight of non-pneumatic tire
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies different thickness characteristics to different parts of the wheel structure. The rim part is designed with a thickness of 0.5 to 1.5 times the disk part thickness, concentrating the stiffness enhancement where it is most needed for turn responsiveness while keeping the central disk part thinner to minimize weight increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of manufacture

If the disk part and rim part are made as separate members, then the manufacturing flexibility improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing flexibilityVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The wheel part is divided into two separate members: the disk part and the rim part. This segmentation allows each component to be manufactured independently with optimized processes and materials, then joined together. The separate manufacturing improves flexibility while the simple joining structure minimizes the increase in overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3666548B1Non-pneumatic tire
Publication Date: 2023.02.15 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • EP3666548B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3666548B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3666548B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

This non-pneumatic tire (10a) is provided with a tread ring (12), a wheel (14a) which is arranged radially inside of the tread ring (12), and spokes (16a) which are interposed between the tread ring (12) and the wheel (14a). Further, the wheel (14a) has a disc part (20a) to which the vehicle shaft (26) is linked, and a rim part (22a) which is connected on the inner peripheral side to the disc part (20a) and is joined on the outer peripheral side to the spokes (16a). In this configuration, the average thickness (T1) of the disc part (20a) is set to be greater than the average thickness (T2) of the rim part (22a). In other words, the relation T1 > T2 holds.