3D Tissue Engineering via Cell Sheet Stacking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods in tissue engineering struggle to produce complex 3D geometries with curved surfaces and hollow lumens, which are essential for mimicking native tissues like the vasculature and heart, due to limitations in fabrication techniques that lack control over spatial organization and anisotropic architecture.

Innovation Solution

A method involving flexible thermoresponsive nanofabricated substrates and gel-casting techniques to layer and stack aligned cell sheets into desired geometries, such as tubular and ventricular shapes, using custom molds and hydrogels, allowing for the creation of scaffold-free, anisotropic tissues with controlled cellular alignment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Shape

If conventional fabrication techniques are used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but the ability to produce complex 3D geometries with curved surfaces and hollow lumens is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplex 3D geometryVSAvoidfabrication complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The tissue engineering process is segmented into discrete steps: cell sheet preparation on thermoresponsive substrates, geometric patterning, stacking, and casting into molds. This segmentation allows complex 3D geometries to be constructed from simpler 2D components, resolving the contradiction between geometric complexity and manufacturing ease.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from conventional 2D tissue culture to 3D tissue construction by stacking patterned cell sheets into three-dimensional configurations. This dimensional transition enables complex geometries with curved surfaces and hollow lumens while maintaining control through systematic layering and molding processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Stability of the object's composition

If conventional scaffolds are used, then structural support is provided, but control over spatial organization and anisotropic architecture is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial organizationVSAvoidscaffold structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and removes the scaffold component entirely, replacing it with self-assembled cell sheets that provide both structural support and spatial organization. This eliminates the complexity of scaffold design while maintaining architectural control through thermoresponsive substrate patterning and controlled cell sheet stacking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Cell sheets are engineered to self-assemble into organized three-dimensional structures through controlled stacking and casting processes. The cells themselves provide the structural organization and anisotropic architecture needed, eliminating the need for complex external scaffolds while maintaining spatial precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If cell sheets are layered and cast into geometries, then spatial organization and cellular alignment are controlled, but fabrication process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecellular alignmentVSAvoidfabrication process
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Cell sheets are pre-patterned with specific geometries and cellular arrangements on thermoresponsive substrates before stacking. This preliminary geometric definition and cellular organization enables precise spatial control in the final 3D construct while simplifying the overall fabrication process through modular pre-prepared units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention utilizes temperature as a controllable parameter to manage cell sheet attachment and detachment from substrates. By changing temperature, the system transitions between states of cell adhesion and release, enabling precise control over cellular alignment and stacking without complex mechanical manipulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the fabrication of 3D tissues with maintained cellular alignment and functional properties, such as spontaneous contraction in cardiac tubes and myotube formation in skeletal muscles, mimicking native tissue structures and facilitating the study of tissue structure-function relationships.

Implementation Method 1

the flexible scaffold is thermoresponsive. For example, in one aspect, the temperature range is such that at about 30° C. or less, the flexible scaffold detaches; and at about greater than 30° C. (such as about 30.5° C. or 31° C. or greater), the flexible scaffold attaches

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermoresponsive: Phase Change

Data Source

PatentUS20230087578A1Device and methods for engineering 3D complex tissues
Publication Date: 2023.03.23 JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
  • US20230087578A1 patent drawing
  • US20230087578A1 patent drawing
  • US20230087578A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided herein is a method for making a tissue engineering scaffold. The method includes layering at least one sheet of cells onto a flexible scaffold, casting the sheets into geometries, and thereby creating the tissue engineering scaffold. Preferred geometry are non-linear (i.e. not a substantially flat surface such as may be provided by a flat glass substrate). The flexible scaffold is characterized by tensile strength, viscosity, stress, strain, modulus of polymers, or any combination thereof.