Tissue Packaging Layer Detection and Rejection System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing packaging machines for tissue products face inefficiencies due to manual intervention required for correcting errors in product positioning, dimensions, and orientation, leading to machine stoppages, increased costs, and reduced productivity.

Innovation Solution

A machine with a dosing element and loop conveyor system, equipped with detection devices and a processing and control unit, allows for automatic detection and removal of non-conforming layers without stopping the machine, ensuring precise and reliable layer formation and packaging.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual intervention is used to correct errors in product positioning, dimensions, and orientation, then the machine can handle non-conforming products, but the machine must stop and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection capabilityVSAvoidproduction continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically detects non-conforming layers through detection devices and triggers rejection mechanisms without requiring manual intervention. The machine self-corrects by eliminating defective layers while maintaining continuous operation, thus preserving productivity while ensuring quality control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Detection devices continuously monitor layer conformity and provide real-time feedback to the control system. When non-conforming layers are detected, the system immediately activates rejection mechanisms, creating a closed-loop control system that maintains both quality and continuous production

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If the machine stops for manual correction of errors, then accurate error correction can be performed, but time is lost and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayer conformity accuracyVSAvoidmachine stoppage time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The detection devices identify non-conforming layers before they cause downstream problems. The system prepares for rejection by activating mechanisms in advance, allowing continuous operation while maintaining precise quality control without time-loss stoppages

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical correction is replaced with automated detection and rejection systems. Optical sensors, cameras, or other detection devices automatically identify defects and trigger mechanical rejection mechanisms, eliminating the need for manual intervention and maintaining both precision and continuity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If detection devices are added to monitor products in channels, then error identification precision improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection precisionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection devices are integrated into the existing machine structure and serve multiple functions: monitoring product presence, detecting orientation, measuring dimensions, and triggering rejection. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate specialized devices, managing complexity while maintaining high detection precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple detection functions are combined into integrated detection devices that simultaneously monitor multiple parameters (position, orientation, dimensions). The control system consolidates these detection signals and coordinates rejection actions, reducing overall system complexity while improving measurement precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Productivity

If automatic rejection of non-conforming layers is implemented, then productivity is maintained, but the system becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous operation capabilityVSAvoidrejection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The rejection mechanism extracts only the non-conforming layers from the continuous product stream. By isolating and removing only the defective portions rather than stopping the entire system, the machine maintains continuous operation and high productivity with a relatively simple rejection mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS12319459B2Machine for packaging groups of tissue products and method for checking the conformity of layers of groups of tissue products
Publication Date: 2025.06.03 TMC SPA
  • US12319459B2 patent drawing
  • US12319459B2 patent drawing
  • US12319459B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A machine for packaging groups of tissue products includes a dosing element with a plurality of passageways, each for receiving a row formed by a predetermined number of products for defining a layer of a group of products. A detection device associated with the dosing element detects a filling parameter relative to a number, dimension and/or orientation of the products occupying the passageways and generates a signal representing the filling parameter. A processing and control unit receives the signals representing the products and processes the signals to compare with signals relating to a reference layer for deriving an acceptance condition, wherein the layer is consistent with the reference layer and suitable for the packaging, or for eliminating the layer of products released from the dosing element. A rejection system ejects the layer when it is in the eliminating condition.