Tissue Motion Comparison Display for Ultrasound Diagnostics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for diagnosing myocardial wall health rely on subjective comparisons of tissue motion images, lacking objective and automated analysis to accurately differentiate between normal and abnormal motion.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that automatically compares detected tissue motion characteristics to a reference motion, using ultrasound data to determine differences in amplitude and angle, and displays this information for enhanced diagnostic accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If automated comparison of tissue motion characteristics is implemented, then diagnostic accuracy and objectivity are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A computer system acts as an intermediary between the ultrasound imaging system and the diagnostician, automatically comparing tissue motion characteristics to reference data and providing objective diagnostic assistance, thereby improving measurement precision without requiring the diagnostician to perform complex manual comparisons

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of visual comparison and subjective judgment is replaced with an automated computer-based system that processes tissue motion characteristics digitally, substituting human cognitive effort with algorithmic analysis to enhance diagnostic accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If multiple imaging modes and detection techniques are used to provide additional diagnostic information, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and ease of operation worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic information qualityVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple imaging modes (B-mode, Doppler mode) and detection techniques are merged into a single integrated system that simultaneously acquires and processes various types of data, allowing comprehensive diagnostic information to be obtained without requiring the operator to manually switch between multiple separate systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The imaging system is designed with multi-functionality to perform multiple diagnostic tasks using different imaging modes and detection techniques within a single platform, enabling comprehensive tissue motion analysis while maintaining ease of operation through unified control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9814439B2Tissue motion comparison display
Publication Date: 2017.11.14 SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA INC
  • US9814439B2 patent drawing
  • US9814439B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A difference between a detected motion and a reference motion is automatically displayed. The reference motion is a modeled motion of an organ, a base line motion of an organ or another portion of an organ. A deviation in motion amplitude, angle or both angle and amplitude from a reference set may more easily identify abnormal or normal motion of the organ.