Multi-scale Titanium Implant Surface Topography for Osseointegration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current dental implants face challenges in achieving optimal osseointegration due to limitations in surface topography, particularly in creating effective nano-scale and micro-scale features that enhance bonding with bone tissue.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a titanium dental implant with a multi-scale topography that includes coarse-micron, fine-micron, and submicron features, specifically using grit blasting and acid etching to create micro-scale roughness and potentiostatic anodization to form nanoscale tube-like structures, which are superimposed on the implant surface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single-scale roughened surface is used, then the manufacturing process is simple, but the osseointegration rate and strength are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveosseointegration strengthVSAvoidsurface topography complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The implant surface is segmented into multiple distinct topographical scales: micro-scale roughness (1-10 microns) and submicron nanoscale features (50-500 nanometers). Each scale serves specific functions in bone integration, with the micro-scale providing mechanical interlocking and the nanoscale enhancing cellular interaction and osteoblast activity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The surface topology implements a nested structure where nanoscale features are superimposed within and between micro-scale roughness features. This hierarchical nesting allows smaller scale features to be contained within the larger scale topography, maximizing surface complexity within limited spatial constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Reliability

If additional coating materials are applied to enhance osseointegration, then bonding strength improves, but the device complexity and manufacturing steps increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebone bonding strengthVSAvoidcoating process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The implant surface structure itself provides the osseointegration enhancement without requiring additional coating materials. The dual-scale topography is created directly on the titanium substrate through controlled surface treatment processes, eliminating the need for separate HA coating deposition steps while achieving superior bone bonding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The surface treatment modifies the physical and chemical parameters of the titanium surface by creating specific micro-scale and submicron topographical features. This changes the surface area, roughness, and surface energy characteristics to promote direct bone apposition and osteoblast activity without adding foreign materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the surface is highly roughened to enhance osseointegration, then bone bonding improves, but the surface area increases which may lead to higher stress distribution issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveosseointegration rateVSAvoidimplant surface area
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The surface treatment applies different topographical characteristics to different regions and scales: micro-scale roughness provides broad mechanical interlocking across the surface, while localized submicron nanoscale features concentrate cellular interaction sites. This local differentiation optimizes both bonding strength and stress distribution by matching surface properties to specific functional requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly enhances osseointegration by accelerating bone integration, reducing the need for additional materials, and providing a consistent topography that improves mechanical stability and osseointegration strength.

Implementation Method 1

grit blasting at least the portion of a surface of the implant to produce a first roughened surface including peak-to-valley heights of about 10 microns to about 30 microns

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Implementation Method 2

acid etching the grit blasted surface to produce a second roughened surface having peak-to-valley heights of less than about 10 microns superimposed on the first roughened surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical etching: Ablation

Implementation Method 3

providing a submicron topography superimposed on the second roughened surface, the submicron topography including nanoscale tube-like structures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAnodization: Anodising

Data Source

PatentEP3823552B1Surface treatment for an implant surface
Publication Date: 2023.03.15 BIOMET 3I LLC
  • EP3823552B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3823552B1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2c
  • EP3823552B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3c

AI summary

An implant system and a method of forming the implant system including an implant to be implanted into living bone. The implant includes titanium. The implant includes a first surface geometry on a first portion of a surface of the implant and a second surface geometry on a second portion of the surface of the implant. The first surface geometry includes at least a submicron topography including tube-like structures and the second surface geometry includes a first micro-scale topography, a second micro-scale topography superimposed on the first topography, and a submicron topography superimposed on the first and second micro-scale topographies, the submicron topography including the tube-like structures.