TLR Agonists Modulate PD-1 Expression on T Cells

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cancer vaccines, particularly those for prostate cancer, face challenges in eliciting a strong anti-tumor immune response due to low immunogenicity and limited effectiveness, with existing methods failing to adequately stimulate CD8+ T cell responses and overcome immune checkpoint blockade limitations.

Innovation Solution

Administering TLR1/2 or TLR7 agonists in combination with immunotherapeutic agents, such as vaccines, to enhance immune responses by down-regulating PD-1 expression on activated immune cells, thereby increasing the efficacy of anti-tumor responses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If current anti-cancer DNA vaccines are used, then they are safe and immunologically effective, but they produce weak anti-tumor responses and require multiple administrations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanti-tumor response strengthVSAvoidnumber of administrations required
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the immune response parameters by combining DNA vaccines with TLR agonists (such as CpG oligonucleotides for TLR9 or poly(I:C) for TLR3), which changes the activation state of dendritic cells and T cells. This parameter change in the immune activation pathway leads to stronger anti-tumor responses and potentially reduced need for multiple administrations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses composite immunotherapeutic formulations combining DNA vaccine plasmids with TLR agonist molecules. This composite approach integrates multiple functional elements (antigen expression from DNA + TLR activation) to achieve synergistic effects that strengthen the anti-tumor response and improve vaccine efficacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If immune checkpoint blockades are used, then they show promise in treating many cancers, but prostate cancer has been notoriously unaffected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse to immunotherapeutic agentVSAvoideffectiveness across different cancer types
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality modification by targeting specific TLR pathways (TLR3, TLR7, TLR9) that can be activated by specific agonists. This localized activation of innate immune pathways creates a more potent and adaptable response that may overcome the resistance to checkpoint blockades observed in prostate cancer, while maintaining effectiveness across different cancer types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The TLR agonists act as intermediary molecules that bridge the gap between the DNA vaccine and the adaptive immune response. By first activating TLRs on dendritic cells, these intermediaries enhance the overall immune activation and may restore sensitivity to immunotherapeutic agents in cancers that are resistant to standard checkpoint blockades.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If methods to increase the number of T cells stimulated/activated upon vaccination are used, then immunogenicity may improve, but activation-induced PD-1 expression increases which limits effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of activated T cellsVSAvoidPD-1 expression on activated T cells
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful effect of T cell activation (which normally induces PD-1 expression and limits effectiveness) into a benefit by simultaneously activating TLRs. The TLR activation creates a dual signal that promotes T cell proliferation while modulating PD-1 expression, transforming the activation-induced limitation into an enhanced immune response opportunity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the parameter of T cell activation by introducing TLR signaling parallel to antigen stimulation. This dual parameter activation (antigen + TLR ligand) modifies the activation-induced PD-1 expression pattern, creating a more favorable balance between T cell proliferation and functional effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly enhances anti-tumor immune responses, leading to reduced tumor growth and, in some cases, complete tumor regression, by promoting a PD-1low phenotype in activated T cells, which are less susceptible to immune checkpoint-mediated regulation.

Implementation Method 1

TLR1/2 or TLR7 agonists in combination with immunotherapeutic agents, such as vaccines, to enhance immune responses by down-regulating PD-1 expression on activated immune cells

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectToll-like receptor activation:

Implementation Method 2

promoting a PD-1low phenotype in activated T cells, which are less susceptible to immune checkpoint-mediated regulation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImmune checkpoint modulation:

Data Source

PatentUS20240390487A1TLR agonists for reducing activation-induced PD-1 expression on t cells and methods of use
Publication Date: 2024.11.28 WISCONSIN ALUMNI RES FOUND
  • US20240390487A1 patent drawing
  • US20240390487A1 patent drawing
  • US20240390487A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention is directed toward methods of increasing the immune response to an antigen using TLR1/2 agonist and/or TLR7 agonist in combination with a T cell activating treatment, for example, a vaccine. In some aspects, the present invention provides methods of enhancing an anti-tumor response comprising administering at least one TLR1/2 agonist and/or at least one TLR7 agonist in combination with an immunotherapeutic agent.