TMR Free Layer Composite Structure with Weak Plasma Etch

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current TMR sensors face challenges in achieving low magnetostriction, low coercivity, and high magnetoresistive ratio while maintaining a low areal resistance, especially with CoFeB-based free layers which often result in high magnetostriction and degraded TMR ratios when combined with NiFe layers.

Innovation Solution

A composite free layer configuration with a first ferromagnetic layer (FL1) undergoing a weak plasma etch treatment before the insertion layer and second ferromagnetic layer (FL2) deposition, utilizing a FL1/INS/FL2 structure where FL1 is modified to enhance surface structure and energy, and INS is an alloy with magnetic and non-magnetic elements, maintaining strong magnetic coupling for improved performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If CoFeB-based free layers are used to achieve low coercivity, then coercivity is reduced, but magnetostriction increases and TMR ratio degrades

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecoercivityVSAvoidmagnetostriction
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a composite free layer structure consisting of CoFeB layer, NiFe layer, and Ru insertion layer. This composite structure combines materials with different magnetic properties to achieve low coercivity while controlling magnetostriction. The Ru insertion layer specifically prevents unwanted magnetic coupling between CoFeB and NiFe, allowing each layer to contribute its advantageous properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The Ru insertion layer acts as an intermediary between the CoFeB and NiFe layers. It prevents direct magnetic coupling that would cause magnetostriction degradation, while still allowing the structure to benefit from the low coercivity of CoFeB and the soft magnetic properties of NiFe.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If NiFe layers are combined with CoFeB to reduce magnetostriction, then magnetostriction is reduced, but TMR ratio degrades

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemagnetostrictionVSAvoidTMR ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The Ru insertion layer serves as a mediator that prevents direct contact and strong magnetic coupling between the NiFe and CoFeB layers. This controlled separation maintains the TMR ratio by preventing degradation from direct coupling, while still allowing the composite structure to achieve low magnetostriction through the combined layers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different materials and properties to different parts of the free layer structure. The CoFeB layer provides low coercivity, the NiFe layer provides soft magnetic properties and low magnetostriction, and the Ru insertion layer provides controlled separation. Each layer has a specific local function that contributes to the overall performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If weak plasma etch treatment is applied to FL1 surface, then surface structure and energy are modified improving TMR ratio, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveTMR ratioVSAvoidmanufacturing process
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The weak plasma etch treatment is applied as a preliminary action to the CoFeB layer surface before depositing the Ru insertion layer and NiFe layer. This pre-treatment modifies the surface structure and energy to optimize subsequent layer formation and achieve high TMR ratio, integrating the complexity into an early manufacturing step.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach achieves a high TMR ratio greater than 60% with low areal resistance and magnetostriction, enhancing signal-to-noise ratio and magnetic stability, while being cost-effective and compatible with existing manufacturing processes.

Implementation Method 1

the FL1 surface structure and surface energy are modified by a weak plasma etch treatment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasma etch: Plasma

Implementation Method 2

The tunnel barrier layer is so thin that a current through it can be established by quantum mechanical tunneling of conduction electrons

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectQuantum mechanical tunneling:

Implementation Method 3

The electrical resistance through the tunnel barrier layer (insulator layer) varies with the relative orientation of the free layer moment compared with the reference layer moment and thereby converts magnetic signals into electrical signals

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetoresistive effect: Magnetoresistance

Implementation Method 4

The outer pinned layer has a magnetic moment that is fixed in a certain direction by exchange coupling with the adjacent AFM layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExchange coupling:

Implementation Method 5

maintaining strong coupling between the FL1 and FL2 magnetic layers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic coupling:

Data Source

PatentUS8456781B2TMR device with novel free layer structure
Publication Date: 2013.06.04 HEADWAY TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US8456781B2 patent drawing
  • US8456781B2 patent drawing
  • US8456781B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A composite free layer having a FL1/insertion/FL2 configuration where a top surface of FL1 is treated with a weak plasma etch is disclosed for achieving enhanced dR/R while maintaining low RA, and low λ in TMR or GMR sensors. The weak plasma etch removes less than about 0.2 Angstroms of FL1 and is believed to modify surface structure and possibly increase surface energy. FL1 may be CoFe, CoFe/CoFeB, or alloys thereof having a (+) λ value. FL2 may be CoFe, NiFe, or alloys thereof having a (−) λ value. The thin insertion layer includes at least one magnetic element such as Co, Fe, and Ni, and at least one non-magnetic element. When CoFeBTa is selected as insertion layer, the CoFeB:Ta ratio is from 1:1 to 4:1.