Cognitive Function Evaluation Using TMT Residence and Movement Time

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing methods for estimating Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores using Trail Making Test (TMT) results have low accuracy and require multiple TMT executions, making it difficult to achieve high-accuracy cognitive function evaluation in a short time.

Innovation Solution

A cognitive function evaluation method that extracts 'residence time', 'movement time', 'position', and 'direction' parameters from TMT data, using these parameters in a stepwise analysis to improve correlation between TMT and MMSE, allowing for high-accuracy evaluation with fewer TMT executions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If MMSE score estimation is performed based on TMT implementation time only, then the evaluation process is simple and fast, but the estimation accuracy is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation speedVSAvoidMMSE score estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameters used for TMT evaluation from simple implementation time to multiple detailed parameters including residence time, movement time, position coordinates, and movement direction. This parameter transformation enables more accurate cognitive function assessment while maintaining evaluation efficiency through automated data processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If multiple TMT executions are performed to improve estimation accuracy, then the MMSE score estimation accuracy improves, but the evaluation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveMMSE score estimation accuracyVSAvoidevaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from one-dimensional evaluation (implementation time only) to multi-dimensional evaluation by incorporating residence time, movement time, position, and direction parameters. This dimensional expansion enables high-accuracy cognitive function assessment with a single TMT execution, eliminating the need for multiple repetitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Device complexity

If only implementation time is used for TMT evaluation, then the evaluation process is simple and quick, but the correlation with MMSE score is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation process complexityVSAvoidcorrelation between TMT and MMSE
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the TMT evaluation process into multiple independent measurement components: residence time at each passing point, movement time between points, position coordinates, and movement direction. This segmentation allows comprehensive cognitive function assessment while enabling automated processing that maintains operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20240374203A1Cognitive function evaluation method, cognitive function inspection method, system, and computer program
Publication Date: 2024.11.14 MAXELL LTD
  • US20240374203A1 patent drawing
  • US20240374203A1 patent drawing
  • US20240374203A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A cognitive function evaluation method includes executing an inspection based on a TMT for urging a subject to connect passing points by a line, extracting, from the obtained inspection data, first inspection value data related to a residence time during which a line drawn by the subject sequentially tracking the passing points stagnates at a first passing point that is any one of the passing points from when the drawn line reaches the first passing point until when the drawn line starts moving to a second passing point, and second inspection value data related to a movement time required from when the drawn line starts moving from the first passing point until when the drawn line reaches the second passing point; and evaluating a cognitive function of the subject based on the first inspection value data and the second inspection value data which have been extracted.