Child-Resistant Tobacco Container With Flexing Sidewall

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing child-resistant containers for tobacco products are costly and complex to manufacture while ensuring that adults can easily access the contents while preventing children from doing so.

Innovation Solution

Designing a container with a body portion and cover that includes structural features such as channels and gaps allowing adult access through flexing, combined with interference or snap fits for secure engagement, and visual or tactile cues for easy opening by adults.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If complex child-resistant mechanisms are implemented, then child safety is improved, but manufacturing cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechild safetyVSAvoidcontainer structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The container is divided into distinct functional elements: a body portion with an opening, a cover that selectively covers the opening, and a flex feature with specific structural segments (first and second portions) that can independently deform. This segmentation allows each element to perform its specific function while keeping individual components relatively simple to manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The flex feature introduces dynamic behavior to an otherwise static container structure. The first portion of the sidewall is designed to deform elastically in response to applied forces, allowing the container to transition between locked and unlocked states. This dynamic property enables child-resistant functionality without requiring complex mechanical mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If complex child-resistant mechanisms are implemented, then child safety is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechild safetyVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The flex feature is integrated directly into the container's sidewall structure, merging the child-resistant mechanism with the container body itself. This eliminates the need for separate, additional child-resistant components that would increase manufacturing cost. The interference fit between the cover and body is also designed to work in conjunction with the flex feature, creating a unified system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The flex feature utilizes changes in the physical parameters of the container wall (flexibility, elasticity) to achieve child-resistant functionality. By carefully selecting wall thickness, material properties, and geometric parameters of the first and second portions, the container achieves the desired force requirements without complex mechanisms. The design allows the same basic structure to serve both containment and child-resistant functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If secure engagement between cover and body is implemented, then containment is improved, but ease of opening by adults deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengagement strengthVSAvoidease of opening
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The interference fit between the cover and body creates a preliminary locking action that prevents accidental opening by children. The geometric interlocking and frictional forces are designed to resist opening forces below a certain threshold. However, the flex feature provides a predetermined failure point that allows adults to overcome this preliminary anti-action by applying sufficient force to deform the flexible portion, thereby opening the container.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The container effectively prevents children from opening the container while allowing adults to easily access the contents, reducing the risk of poisoning and maintaining a reasonable manufacturing cost and complexity.

Implementation Method 1

a portion of the primary wall flexes relative to the secondary wall upon application of a force thereto. The primary wall returns to an unflexed or neutral position after removal of the force.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS20240365856A1Child-resistant container for tobacco-containing products
Publication Date: 2024.11.07 NICOVENTURES TRADING LTD
  • US20240365856A1 patent drawing
  • US20240365856A1 patent drawing
  • US20240365856A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to child resistant containers and methods of making same for products made or derived from tobacco, or that otherwise incorporate tobacco, and are intended for human consumption.