Asynchronous Braking for Tobacco Cutting Device Collision Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cutting devices in the tobacco processing industry face a high risk of collision between knives and tubes during shutdown or fault conditions, leading to operational failures and malfunctions.

Innovation Solution

A control system that generates a switch-off signal to initiate an asynchronous braking operation, ensuring that at least one of the carriers is rotated into a predetermined stop position outside the common cutting positions of the knife and tube, decoupling them quickly to prevent collisions, using a rotational difference and auxiliary power supply for efficient decoupling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If direct rotary drives with individual electrical control are used for blade carrier and tube carrier, then synchronous operation can be controlled and productivity is improved, but the risk of collision between knives and tubes increases during shutdown or fault conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting speedVSAvoidcollision risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control device is configured to detect shutdown or fault conditions and automatically initiate a collision-preventing braking sequence before actual collision can occur. The system applies brake forces to carriers in a predetermined sequence that ensures knives and tubes are positioned away from each other's paths during deceleration, thereby preventing collisions that would otherwise occur during uncontrolled shutdown.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

2Reliability

If tubes and knives are provided with predetermined breaking points for collision protection, then safety is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision protectionVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces passive mechanical collision protection (breaking points in tubes and knives) with an active control system that uses electrical signals and controlled braking to prevent collisions. The control device monitors carrier positions and triggers braking sequences electronically, eliminating the need for structural weak points in the cutting components themselves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If asynchronous braking is implemented to prevent collisions during shutdown, then reliability is improved, but control complexity and energy requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision-free shutdownVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control device is pre-programmed with braking sequences that are automatically executed upon detection of shutdown conditions. The system calculates and applies appropriate brake forces to carriers in a predetermined sequence that guarantees collision-free stopping, eliminating the need for complex real-time calculations during actual shutdown events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If one carrier is braked faster than the other during asynchronous braking, then collision prevention is improved, but the braking time and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision preventionVSAvoidbraking time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts brake forces applied to different carriers based on their current positions, speeds, and masses. The system continuously monitors carrier states during braking and modulates brake intensity to optimize the stopping sequence, achieving collision-free shutdown in minimal time while accounting for the different inertial properties of the blade and tube carriers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively prevents collisions during shutdown or fault conditions by ensuring the knife and tube carriers are decoupled in a collision-free manner, allowing for safe and efficient stopping within a short time frame, even with a temporary auxiliary power supply.

Implementation Method 1

direct rotary drives for the blade carrier and the tube carrier, formed by electric motors fixed to the frame

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

asynchronous braking operation in such a way that at least one of the two carriers (tube carrier or knife carrier) is rotated into a predetermined stop position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP2263483B9Cutting device for the tobacco industry for cutting at least one transported strand into a number of rod-shaped articles and method for disabling the cutting device
Publication Date: 2015.09.09 KORBER TECHNOLOGIES GMBH
  • EP2263483B9 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2263483B9 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2263483B9 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A cutting device (1) for the tobacco processing industry, used to cut at least one conveyed strand (9) into a plurality of rod-shaped articles, comprises a knife carrier (20) and a tube carrier (30), as well as a control unit (8). The control unit (8) is configured and connected to rotary drives (4, 5) of the carriers (20, 30) such that it generates a shutdown signal and initiates and executes a defined asynchronous braking operation for the controlled shutdown of the cutting device (1) operating in synchronous cutting mode. At least one (30) of the two carriers (20, 30) is rotated into a predetermined stop position (SP) within a predefined braking time (BT) that begins upon exiting synchronous operation, whereby the knife (21, 22) and tube (31 to 34) are always located outside their common cutting positions. The aforementioned steps for shutting down the cutting device (1) are carried out according to the method of the invention.