Toe-In Omnidirectional Front Wheels for Stable Low-Vibration Mobility

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional electromobility vehicles face challenges in stabilizing the rider's posture and reducing vibrations generated by the contact of rollers with the ground, leading to undesirable tilting and increased vibration transmission to the seat.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates omnidirectional wheels with a toe-in arrangement supported by a suspension system that includes a biasing member to absorb vibrations, where the axle is inclined relative to the vehicle frame, and the rollers have rubber-like elasticity and circumferential grooves to mitigate impact forces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If rollers are used to form the wheel's outer circumferential surface, then the wheel can provide tractive force, but vibrations are generated when the rollers come into contact with the ground one after another

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetractive forceVSAvoidvibrations
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A rubber buffer member is interposed between the rollers to cushion the impact before it reaches the wheel hub. This buffer member absorbs the shock generated when rollers contact the ground, reducing vibrations while maintaining the rollers' tractive force generation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The wheel structure combines rigid components (rollers, wheel hub) with elastic materials (rubber buffer member). This composite structure allows the rigid rollers to provide tractive force while the elastic rubber material absorbs vibrations, resolving the contradiction between force generation and vibration reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Object-generated harmful factors

If the wheel uses a smooth circular outer circumferential surface, then vibrations are reduced, but tractive force is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovevibrationsVSAvoidtractive force
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The wheel's outer circumferential surface is segmented into multiple rollers instead of being a smooth continuous surface. This segmentation allows each roller to independently contact the ground, reducing vibration transmission while the collective arrangement of rollers maintains effective tractive force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If the front wheels are arranged in parallel, then the structure is simple, but the vehicle becomes unstable and tends to tilt

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewheel arrangementVSAvoidvehicle stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The front wheels are arranged in a toe-in configuration where the inner edges of the wheels are closer together than the outer edges. This asymmetric arrangement creates a stabilizing effect that prevents the vehicle from tilting, while still maintaining relatively simple structural implementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

4Stability of the object's composition

If a spring is used to bias the floor frame, then idling is suppressed, but the structure becomes complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidling suppressionVSAvoidsuspension structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The suspension system combines multiple functions into an integrated structure: the spring provides both the biasing force to suppress idling and the suspension function to reduce vibrations. This merging of functions achieves stability and comfort without requiring separate complex systems for each purpose.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration effectively reduces vibrations transmitted to the seat while maintaining tractive force and preventing uneven wear, enhancing rider stability and comfort.

Implementation Method 1

a rubber buffer member is interposed between the rollers in order to reduce vibrations that are generated when the rollers come into contact with the ground

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a suspension attached to a front-end side of the vehicle frame; a pair of front wheels arranged in a vehicle width direction and supported by the suspension

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration absorption: Damping

Implementation Method 3

the rollers have rubber-like elasticity and circumferential grooves to mitigate impact forces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS11827053B2Electromobility vehicle
Publication Date: 2023.11.28 WHILL
  • US11827053B2 patent drawing
  • US11827053B2 patent drawing
  • US11827053B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This electromobility vehicle includes a vehicle frame, a seat unit mounted to the vehicle frame, a suspension mounted to a front-end side of the vehicle frame, a pair of front wheels aligned in a direction parallel to a width dimension of the vehicle and supported by the suspension, at least one rear wheel supported by the vehicle frame, and a drive device that drives either of the front wheels and the rear wheel, where the front wheels are omnidirectional wheels whose outer circumferential surfaces are formed by a plurality of rollers and the pair of front wheels is supported by the suspension such that it is placed in a toe-in arrangement.