Time-of-Flight Depth Mapping Using Multiple Pulse Repetition Intervals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing time-of-flight (ToF) depth mapping systems face challenges with low signal/noise ratio (SNR) and range folding, particularly when incorporated into mobile devices where radio frequency interference can degrade performance.

Innovation Solution

The system employs multiple pulse repetition intervals (PRIs) to improve SNR and resolve range folding. Processing and control circuitry selects and drives different PRIs to emit sequences of pulses, allowing for the computation of depth coordinates by analyzing the times of flight of the pulses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a single pulse repetition interval (PRI) is used in ToF depth mapping, then the measurement process is simple and fast, but range folding occurs at distances beyond the range limit defined by the PRI

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement speedVSAvoiddepth accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between multiple PRIs (first PRI, second PRI greater than first, third PRI greater than second) based on the depth coordinates being measured. This allows the measurement range to be adapted to different scene depths, resolving range folding while maintaining measurement efficiency through selective PRI usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the PRI parameter across different measurement sequences. By using a first sequence at first PRI, second sequence at second PRI, and third sequence at third PRI, the system expands the measurable depth range and resolves range folding ambiguities that would occur with a single fixed PRI.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If multiple pulse repetition intervals (PRIs) are used to resolve range folding, then depth accuracy is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedepth accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic pulse sequences at different PRIs (first sequence, second sequence, third sequence) to measure depth. By systematically alternating between multiple PRIs and processing the combined results, the system achieves high depth accuracy while managing complexity through structured periodic measurement cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Measurement precision

If a short pulse repetition interval (PRI) is used, then the range limit is reduced and range folding is avoided, but the maximum measurable depth is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverange resolutionVSAvoidmaximum depth range
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically selects from multiple PRIs (first PRI for shorter ranges, second and third PRIs for extended ranges) based on the actual depth coordinates in the scene. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain high range resolution for nearby objects while extending the maximum measurable depth for distant objects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

By changing the PRI parameter across different measurement sequences (first sequence at first PRI, second sequence at second PRI, third sequence at third PRI), the system achieves both high range resolution and extended maximum depth range, resolving the contradiction between range limit and measurable depth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the signal/noise ratio and effectively resolves range folding issues, enabling accurate depth mapping over a wider range while minimizing interference with radio transceivers in mobile devices.

Implementation Method 1

measuring the round-trip time, i.e. time-of-flight (ToF), taken by the optical beams as they travel from the source to the target scene and back to a detector array

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime of flight: Time of Flight

Implementation Method 2

Some ToF systems use single-photon avalanche diodes (SPADs), also known as Geiger-mode avalanche photodiodes (GAPDs), in measuring photon arrival time

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSingle-photon avalanche diode detection: Avalanche Breakdown

Data Source

PatentUS12306307B2Selection of pulse repetition intervals for sensing time of flight
Publication Date: 2025.05.20 APPLE INC
  • US12306307B2 patent drawing
  • US12306307B2 patent drawing
  • US12306307B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Sensing apparatus includes a radiation source, which emits pulses of optical radiation toward multiple points in a target scene. A receiver receives the optical radiation that is reflected from the target scene and outputs signals that are indicative of respective times of flight of the pulses to and from the points in the target scene. Processing and control circuitry selects a first pulse repetition interval (PRI), a second PRI, greater than the first PRI, and a third PRI, greater than the second PRI, from a permitted range of PRIs, drives the radiation source to emit sequences of the pulses at the first PRI, the second PRI, and the third PRI, and processes the signals output by the receiver in response to the first, second, and third sequences of the pulses in order to compute respective depth coordinates of the points in the target scene.