TOF Gesture HMI for Touchless Industrial Machine Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current industrial control systems rely on a master-slave human-machine collaboration, limiting active contribution from both humans and industrial equipment, and face challenges with touch screen interfaces in harsh environments due to grime buildup and incompatibility with gloves, as well as inadequate safety zone demarcation in industrial automation environments.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing time-of-flight sensors to detect and interpret user body movements, allowing for touchless control of industrial machinery and dynamic safety zone demarcation, enabling effective human-machine collaboration and improved safety in industrial environments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If touch screen monitors are used in industrial environments, then user interface functionality is provided, but sensitivity deteriorates over time due to grime and detritus buildup

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetouch screen functionalityVSAvoidtouch screen sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the interaction interface from physical contact with the screen surface. Instead of requiring direct touch on the screen, the system uses cameras and image processing to detect hand gestures and body movements in the air space in front of the display, completely eliminating the grime buildup problem that affects traditional touch screens in industrial environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer between the user and the control system. A camera-based gesture recognition system acts as a mediator, translating physical hand movements and body gestures into digital commands without requiring contact with the screen surface, thereby maintaining reliability while preserving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If touch screens require physical contact for manipulation, then direct control is achieved, but usage becomes hazardous in chemically corrosive environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedirect control capabilityVSAvoidchemical exposure risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the requirement for physical contact with the screen entirely. By using camera-based gesture recognition, operators can control the system from a safe distance, eliminating exposure to chemically corrosive environments while maintaining direct control capability through real-time gesture response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical contact-based touch screen interface with an optical system. Cameras capture hand gestures and body movements, and image processing algorithms translate these visual inputs into control commands, substituting mechanical interaction with optical field-based interaction that eliminates chemical exposure risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If stylus or scribing means are used to manipulate touch screens, then precise input is achieved, but the screen surface becomes scratched and etched

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinput precisionVSAvoidscreen surface damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the input mechanism from physical contact with the screen surface. Hand gestures performed in the air space in front of the display are captured by cameras and translated into precise digital commands, eliminating the need for styluses or scribing tools that cause screen damage while maintaining input precision through gesture recognition algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If traditional safety zones are demarcated in industrial environments, then safety monitoring is provided, but the zones are static and inflexible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety monitoringVSAvoidsafety zone flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms static safety zones into dynamic, adaptive zones. The system continuously tracks operator position and gestures in real-time, allowing safety boundaries to adjust automatically based on current operational context. This enables the safety system to respond flexibly to changing conditions while maintaining reliable monitoring through continuous camera-based detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient and safe control of industrial machinery through touchless interfaces and dynamic safety zone management, enhancing collaboration and reducing the risk of accidents in industrial settings.

Implementation Method 1

employing a time-of-flight sensor to detect movement of a body part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime of flight: Time of Flight

Data Source

PatentEP2442196B1Time of flight (TOF) human machine interface (HMI)
Publication Date: 2023.07.05 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION SWITZERLAND
  • EP2442196B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2442196B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2442196B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for controlling industrial equipment in the performance of various industrial activities based on the detected body movement of a user in an industrial automation environment. The method includes employing a time-of-flight sensor to detect movement of a body part of the user, ascertaining whether or not the movement of the body part conforms to a recognized movement of the body part, interpreting the recognized movement of the body part as a performable action, and thereafter actuating industrial machinery to perform the performable action.