3D Time-of-Flight Sensor for Hinged Part Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional single-point and 2-D imaging sensors are inefficient for determining the presence or absence of hinged parts in 3-D space, requiring multiple sensors, complex installations, and significant setup time, and fail to provide clear visualization of robot and vehicle positions relative to each other in 3-D space, leading to potential collisions and production downtime.

Innovation Solution

The use of 2.5-D hybrid sensors that project and detect near-infrared patterns to create 3-D graphics of user-defined detection regions, allowing for real-time visualization and automatic coloring of pass or fail conditions, enabling precise detection of hinged parts within defined 3-D spaces without requiring extensive setup or training.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional single-point sensors or 2-D imaging sensors are used to detect hinged parts, then presence/absence detection can be achieved, but the system complexity increases and setup time extends significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepresence/absence detection accuracyVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from traditional 2-D imaging sensors to 3-D time-of-flight sensors that capture depth information. This dimensional upgrade allows the system to detect hinged parts in three-dimensional space, providing accurate presence/absence detection while reducing the number of sensors needed and simplifying system configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The 3-D time-of-flight sensor serves multiple functions simultaneously: it detects presence/absence, determines spatial position, identifies orientation, and monitors movement of hinged parts. This multi-functionality replaces what would traditionally require multiple specialized sensors, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Area of stationary object

If multiple sensors are deployed to monitor multiple hinged parts in 3-D space, then detection coverage improves, but installation and maintenance complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection coverage volumeVSAvoidinstallation and maintenance complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple detection functions into a single 3-D time-of-flight sensor system. Instead of deploying multiple 2-D sensors or single-point sensors throughout the workspace, one 3-D sensor captures the entire volume, reducing installation complexity and maintenance requirements while maintaining comprehensive detection coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

By adding the depth dimension with 3-D time-of-flight sensing, the system achieves comprehensive volumetric detection coverage with a single sensor rather than requiring multiple 2-D sensors positioned throughout the space. This dimensional expansion eliminates the need for complex multi-sensor installations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If 2-D image processing algorithms are used to infer hinged part positions, then presence detection is possible, but the system becomes sensitive to ambient light and shadows

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehinged part position detectionVSAvoidambient light and shadow interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces optical 2-D image processing with 3-D time-of-flight measurement technology. Instead of analyzing 2-D images that are susceptible to lighting conditions, the system uses active 3-D sensing that measures the time for light to travel to and from objects, providing accurate depth information independent of ambient light and shadow conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If traditional sensors are used without 3-D visualization, then basic detection functions are maintained, but it becomes difficult to visualize robot and vehicle positions relative to each other in 3-D space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebasic detection operationVSAvoid3-D spatial relationship information
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a real-time 3-D digital copy or representation of the physical workspace, including the vehicle body, hinged parts, and robot positions. This virtual 3-D model provides intuitive visualization of spatial relationships while the actual production operations continue uninterrupted, preserving productivity while eliminating information loss about 3-D positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution provides accurate and intuitive detection of hinged parts in 3-D space, reducing setup time and collisions by offering real-time visualization and automatic indication of pass or fail conditions, and is insensitive to ambient lighting, allowing for efficient operation in automation tasks.

Implementation Method 1

The sensor has a set of radiation sensing elements which detect reflected, projected radiation to obtain 3-D sensor data

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflected radiation detection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

The use of 2.5-D hybrid sensors that project and detect near-infrared patterns to create 3-D graphics

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNear-infrared projection: Infrared Radiation

Data Source

PatentEP3290860B1Method and system for determining the presence or absence of a part of an assembly within a work cell
Publication Date: 2021.03.17 LIBERTY REACH INC
  • EP3290860B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3A
  • EP3290860B1 patent drawingFigure 3B
  • EP3290860B1 patent drawingFigure 4A~4C

AI summary

A method and system for determining the presence or absence of a part of an assembly within at least one user-defined, 3-D detection region within a work cell are provided. The system includes a 3-D or depth sensor having a field of view at the work cell. The sensor has a set of radiation sensing elements which detect reflected, projected radiation to obtain 3-D sensor data. A processor processes the sensor data from the sensor to obtain a 3-D graphic of the at least one detection region. A display displays the 3-D graphic from a viewpoint to determine the presence or absence of the part within the detection region.