TOF-PET Scintillator Layering for Time Resolution and Cost

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing thickness of scintillators in TOF-PET apparatuses enhances detection efficiency but leads to deteriorated time resolution and increased manufacturing costs, while increasing the number of columns further raises costs without significantly improving image quality.

Innovation Solution

Optimizing the thickness of scintillators to a range of 10 mm to 18 mm and increasing the number of columns within a constant total volume to maintain or improve time resolution and image quality, while reducing manufacturing costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the thickness of scintillators is increased to exceed 20 mm to obtain adequate detection efficiency of gamma rays, then detection efficiency is improved, but time resolution deteriorates and manufacturing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection efficiencyVSAvoidtime resolution
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a single thick scintillator to multiple thin scintillators arranged in a layered structure. This dimensional reorganization allows gamma rays to interact with multiple layers, accumulating detection efficiency while maintaining thin individual layers that preserve time resolution. The layered configuration effectively distributes the detection function across multiple dimensions rather than relying on a single thick element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides a single thick scintillator into multiple thin scintillators arranged in layers. Each thin scintillator maintains good time resolution, while the cumulative effect of multiple layers provides adequate detection efficiency. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by distributing the detection function across multiple components rather than concentrating it in one thick element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If the thickness of scintillators is increased to exceed 20 mm to obtain adequate detection efficiency of gamma rays, then detection efficiency is improved, but manufacturing costs increase due to increased scintillator usage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection efficiencyVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the scintillator volume into multiple thin layers rather than using one thick scintillator. This segmentation reduces the total amount of expensive scintillator material required while maintaining detection efficiency through the cumulative interaction of gamma rays with multiple layers. The reduced material volume directly lowers manufacturing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the thickness parameter of individual scintillators from thick (>20mm) to thin (<=20mm), and compensates for detection efficiency by increasing the number of layers. This parameter transformation reduces material consumption and cost while achieving the same functional outcome through a different configurational approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Area of stationary object

If the number of columns of detector ring is increased to increase the size of field of view, then field of view is improved, but manufacturing costs increase due to increased scintillator usage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefield of viewVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation to the scintillator structure within each detector column, using multiple thin layers instead of thick scintillators. This reduces the scintillator material requirement per column, thereby reducing the cost increase when expanding the number of columns to enlarge the field of view.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the scintillator thickness parameter to a thinner configuration, which reduces material consumption. This parameter change makes it more cost-effective to increase the number of columns for expanding field of view, as each column requires less expensive scintillator material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach maintains or improves image quality by enhancing time resolution and reducing manufacturing costs, allowing for a larger field of view without excessive scintillator usage, thus making TOF-PET apparatuses more cost-effective and suitable for dynamic imaging.

Implementation Method 1

A detector of the TOF-PET apparatus contains a scintillator formed from a scintillator material such as LYSO, LSO, and LGSO

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScintillation: Scintillation

Data Source

PatentEP2397871B1TOF-PET apparatus, detector ring and detector
Publication Date: 2020.11.25 TOSHIBA MEDICAL SYST CORP
  • EP2397871B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2397871B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2397871B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

According to one embodiment, a TOF-PET apparatus comprising a plurality of detector rings arranged along a central axis thereof. Each of the detector rings comprises a plurality of scintillators and a plurality of photomultipliers. The scintillators are arranged on a substantial circumference around the central axis and generate scintillation in response to pair annihilation gamma-rays from a subject. The photomultipliers generate an electric signal in accordance with the generated scintillation. A length of each of the scintillators along a radial direction of the substantial circumference is set to a range in which a value of a total number of counts/time resolution of coincidence events of pair annihilation gamma-rays is more improved than when a reference scintillator whose probability of interaction with pair annihilation gamma-rays is adjusted to 80% is used under conditions of a constant total volume of the scintillators.