Time-of-flight rangefinder MTA zone assignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern pulse time-of-flight rangefinders face challenges in accurately assigning received pulses to their corresponding transmission pulses beyond a certain distance range, known as the Multiple Time Around (MTA) zone, leading to incorrect distance measurement results due to overlapping pulses.

Innovation Solution

A method that involves emitting a sequence of transmission pulses with varying intervals, generating candidate distances for each receive pulse based on preceding pulses, and determining a weighting value using distance and amplitude differences to select the most accurate distance measurement value, effectively resolving MTA zone assignment issues even in multi-target situations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If high pulse repetition rates are used to quickly create distance measurement points, then productivity is improved, but the MTA zone size decreases causing incorrect pulse assignment beyond a certain distance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistance measurement points creation speedVSAvoidpulse assignment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the distance measurement process into multiple MTA zones by generating multiple candidate distances for each receive pulse. Each candidate distance is assigned to a specific MTA zone based on transmission pulse timing, allowing the system to handle reflections from different zones separately and correctly identify the valid distance measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses feedback mechanisms by evaluating multiple candidate distances and selecting the valid one based on consistency checks with adjacent transmission pulses. The system feeds back the candidate distance information and uses weighting values to determine which candidate is the correct distance measurement, resolving the pulse assignment ambiguity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Length of stationary object

If high pulse power is used to extend measurement range, then the maximum measurable distance is improved, but the MTA problem worsens due to overlapping reflections from multiple zones

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaximum measurable distanceVSAvoidmultiple reflections interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adds a temporal dimension to distance measurement by considering multiple candidate distances corresponding to different MTA zones. Instead of measuring only the first reflection, the system evaluates reflections from multiple time-around zones, effectively utilizing the time dimension to extend the measurable distance range while managing interference through candidate evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of pulse interval by using varying pulse intervals in the transmission pulse sequence. This variation helps distinguish between reflections from different MTA zones, allowing the system to identify and select the correct distance measurement even when multiple reflections are present.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If pulse intervals are varied to resolve MTA zone assignment, then measurement accuracy beyond MTA zone is improved, but device complexity increases due to multiple candidate evaluation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistance measurement accuracyVSAvoidcandidate distance evaluation process
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by generating a limited number of candidate distances (typically 2-3 candidates) for each receive pulse instead of evaluating all possible distances. This partial evaluation approach provides sufficient accuracy for most applications while keeping the computational complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-calculating and storing transmission pulse timing information before receive pulse processing. This preliminary preparation allows the system to quickly generate and evaluate candidate distances without adding significant processing complexity during the measurement phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method provides robust and reliable MTA zone assignment and correct distance measurement values, enhancing accuracy and precision by utilizing amplitude information for pulse assignment, especially in situations with multiple reflections and distance jumps.

Implementation Method 1

measuring the time-of-flight of pulses reflected by the target, in particular laser pulses

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime-of-flight measurement: Time of Flight

Implementation Method 2

pulses reflected at the targets... light pulses, in particular laser pulses

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS11353585B2Range finding method
Publication Date: 2022.06.07 RIEGL LASER MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS
  • US11353585B2 patent drawing
  • US11353585B2 patent drawing
  • US11353585B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosed subject matter relates to a method for measuring the distance of targets in the surroundings by way of a time-of-flight measurement of pulses reflected at said targets, in particular laser pulses, said method comprising: emitting a sequence of transmission pulses having varying pulse intervals, and receiving at least one receive pulse after each one of two different transmission pulses; for each receive pulse: generating a group of M candidate distances, each based on a different transmission pulse among M transmission pulses preceding the receive pulse, wherein each candidate distance is assigned to the corresponding transmission pulse on which it is based; for each candidate distance: determining a weighting value on the basis of at least the closest of the candidate distances assigned to such a transmission pulse which is adjacent to the transmission pulse to which the candidate distance being considered in this determining process is assigned; for each group: selecting the candidate distance with the highest weighting value as the distance measurement value of the receive pulse for which the group was generated.