Time-of-Flight Proximity Sensing for 3D Robot Object Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional robotic proximity sensors, such as ultrasonic sensors, are inadequate for detecting objects in uncontrolled environments due to limitations in response time, accuracy, and sensitivity to noise and environmental changes, making them unsuitable for robots working alongside humans.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of multiple proximity sensing systems with time-of-flight proximity sensors that can detect a 3D profile of objects, adjust detection range and resolution based on object distance, and predict object movement to enable accurate reaction by the robotic device.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If ultrasonic sensors are used for object detection, then immunity to background noise is improved, but response time becomes slower and blind spots are created

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimmunity to background noiseVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces ultrasonic sensors (acoustic field) with time-of-flight sensors (optical field) to eliminate the inherent limitations of ultrasonic technology. This substitution enables faster response times and eliminates blind spots while maintaining noise immunity through optical detection methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the detection parameter from acoustic wave propagation to light propagation time measurement. By using time-of-flight measurement with optical sensors, the system achieves both fast response times and extended detection range while eliminating the blind spot problem inherent in ultrasonic sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If ultrasonic sensors are used for object detection, then good noise immunity is achieved, but detection accuracy in uncontrolled environments deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise immunityVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes ultrasonic detection with optical time-of-flight detection, replacing acoustic wave-based measurement with light-based measurement. This substitution provides superior detection accuracy in uncontrolled environments while maintaining noise immunity through the use of optical filters and modulated light sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the detection parameter from acoustic properties to optical properties (light travel time). This parameter change enables more precise distance measurement and object detection in varied environmental conditions, overcoming the limitations of ultrasonic sensors in uncontrolled settings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of time

If time-of-flight sensors are used for fast detection, then response time is improved, but detection range and resolution requirements create complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a universal time-of-flight sensor system that can adapt to different detection ranges and resolutions through software control and parameter adjustment. This multi-functional approach allows the same hardware to serve multiple detection needs, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining fast response times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of detection parameters (such as integration time, measurement frequency, and detection threshold) based on real-time conditions. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize performance for different scenarios without requiring multiple fixed-configuration sensor systems, thereby managing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution provides faster and more accurate object detection, allowing robots to differentiate between objects and react appropriately, enhancing safety and operational efficiency in dynamic environments.

Implementation Method 1

time-of-flight proximity sensors, which use light to detect an object within a detection range

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime of flight: Time of Flight

Data Source

PatentUS11453123B2Robotic device with time-of-flight proximity sensing system
Publication Date: 2022.09.27 STMICROELECTRONICS INC
  • US11453123B2 patent drawing
  • US11453123B2 patent drawing
  • US11453123B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A robotic device including one or more proximity sensing systems coupled to various portions of a robot body. The proximity sensing systems detect a distance of an object about the robot body and the robotic device reacts based on the detected distance. The proximity sensing systems obtain a three-dimensional (3D) profile of the object to determine a category of the object. The distance of the object is detected multiple times in a sequence to determine a movement path of the object.