Time-of-Flight Sensor Active Power Control for Glare

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Time-of-flight sensors are unreliable in environments with varied lighting and high reflectivity, leading to unsatisfactory pixel data, which can hinder obstacle detection and safety in autonomous vehicles.

Innovation Solution

Active power control of time-of-flight sensors by adjusting illumination power and integration time based on pixel data quality, using techniques such as varying illumination power and integration time to minimize saturation and underexposure, and employing pixel evaluation and power determination components to dynamically adjust sensor settings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Illumination intensity

If the time-of-flight sensor operates in high-illumination environments or near highly reflective objects, then the sensor can capture more light signals, but saturation occurs making it impossible to infer any information about the scene

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight signal captureVSAvoiddata reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of the sensor's integration time based on real-time scene brightness analysis. The system continuously monitors the brightness of captured images and automatically adjusts the integration time parameter to optimize performance across varying illumination conditions, transforming a static sensor into an adaptive system that prevents saturation while maintaining signal capture capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the integration time parameter dynamically based on scene conditions. When the scene is bright or contains highly reflective objects, the integration time is reduced to prevent saturation. When the scene is darker, the integration time is increased to capture sufficient light signals, thereby maintaining data reliability across different illumination environments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If the sensor increases processing time to better understand unreliable pixel data, then data accuracy may improve, but efficiency in identifying and characterizing objects decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accuracyVSAvoidobject identification efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of scene brightness before object identification processing. By pre-adjusting the integration time based on brightness analysis, the sensor captures reliable data from the outset, eliminating the need for subsequent complex processing to correct unreliable pixel data, thus maintaining both accuracy and efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where the brightness of captured images is continuously monitored and used to adjust the integration time for subsequent captures. This real-time feedback mechanism ensures that the sensor operates in an optimal range, producing reliable data that requires minimal post-processing while maintaining high object identification efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If the sensor operates with fixed integration time and illumination power, then the system is simple to operate, but it cannot adapt to varied lighting conditions and different reflective properties of objects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidenvironmental adaptation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor system performs self-adjustment by automatically analyzing the brightness of captured scenes and autonomously modifying its integration time parameter. This self-service capability eliminates the need for manual configuration or complex external control systems, maintaining ease of operation while achieving high adaptability to varied lighting conditions and different object reflective properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Improves sensor data reliability, enabling more accurate object detection and safer navigation by reducing the impact of environmental factors like glare and high reflectivity.

Implementation Method 1

Time-of-flight sensors may be unreliable in certain environments

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime of flight: Time of Flight

Implementation Method 2

reflections off objects that are extremely close to the sensor, reflections off objects that have high reflectivity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 3

generating controls to adjust attributes of the sensor based on pixel data. The attributes can include illumination power and integration time

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIllumination intensity control:

Implementation Method 4

high reflectivity may cause saturation, making it impossible to infer any information about the scene

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSaturation: Magnetic Saturation

Data Source

PatentUS11561292B1Active power control of sensors
Publication Date: 2023.01.24 ZOOX INC
  • US11561292B1 patent drawing
  • US11561292B1 patent drawing
  • US11561292B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Sensors, including time-of-flight sensors, may be used to detect objects in an environment. In an example, a vehicle may include a time-of-flight sensor that images objects around the vehicle, e.g., so the vehicle can navigate relative to the objects. Sensor data generated by the time-of-flight sensor can return unreliable pixels, e.g., in the case of over- or under-exposure. In some examples, parameters associated with power of a time-of-flight sensor can be altered based on a number of unreliable pixels in measured data and/or based on intensity values of the measured data. For example, unreliable pixels can be determined using phase frame information captured at a receiver of the sensor.