Tolerance Ring Process Control via Remaining Assembly Force

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing methods for determining the initial slip force of tolerance rings are unreliable due to influences from elastic deformation, plastic deformation, roughness, and surface treatment effects, making it difficult to accurately assess the axial slip resistance between mating components.

Innovation Solution

A process control method involving constraining a tolerance ring and measuring the force required to move a component beyond its projections, which provides a more reliable representation of the initial slip force, known as the remaining assembly force, to ensure acceptable axial slip resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If peak assembly force is measured to determine initial slip force, then process control can be implemented, but the measurement is unreliable due to elastic deformation, plastic deformation, roughness, and surface treatment effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of initial slip force measurementVSAvoidaccuracy of slip force measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the harmful influence of surface treatment effects, elastic deformation, and plastic deformation by measuring the force required to move the plug gauge beyond the projections of the tolerance ring, rather than measuring the peak force during initial contact. This isolates the measurement from the distorting factors while capturing the essential friction characteristic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The method performs preliminary action by moving the plug gauge beyond the projections of the tolerance ring before taking the force measurement. This preliminary movement ensures that the measurement is taken after the effects of surface treatment and deformation have been overcome, providing a more reliable indication of initial slip force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If surface treatment steps such as passivation are applied to tolerance rings, then corrosion resistance is improved, but the peak assembly force measurement becomes unreliable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrosion resistance of tolerance ringVSAvoidaccuracy of peak assembly force measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the harmful influence of surface treatment effects on the measurement by changing when the measurement is taken. Instead of measuring peak assembly force during initial contact where surface treatment effects dominate, the measurement is taken after the plug gauge has moved beyond the projections, where surface treatment effects are minimized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Strength

If the plug gauge head contacts the projecting ridge of the tolerance ring during assembly, then the tolerance ring can be compressed and secured, but a peak in assembly force occurs that does not represent initial slip force

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression force applied to tolerance ringVSAvoidaccuracy of slip force representation
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the assembly process into distinct phases: the compression phase where the plug gauge head contacts the projections to secure the tolerance ring, and the measurement phase where the plug gauge has moved beyond the projections. By separating these phases, the measurement is taken when the compression function has been completed and the relevant slip force characteristics are revealed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The compression of the tolerance ring between the plug gauge and ring gauge is performed as a preliminary action before the force measurement is taken. This ensures that the tolerance ring is properly secured and the projections are compressed, allowing the subsequent force measurement to accurately reflect initial slip force rather than compression force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method effectively correlates the remaining assembly force with initial slip force, reducing the impact of surface treatment effects and providing a consistent measurement for process control, ensuring reliable axial slip resistance between components.

Implementation Method 1

a peak in assembly force can occur when the head of the plug gauge initially contacts a projecting ridge of a tolerance ring and energy is required to deform the ridge to enable the gauge to slide over it

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS8615318B2Process control of tolerance rings
Publication Date: 2013.12.24 SAINT GOBAIN PERFORMANCE PLASTICS RENCOL LIMITED
  • US8615318B2 patent drawing
  • US8615318B2 patent drawing
  • US8615318B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of process control including constraining a tolerance ring relative to one of an inner and an outer component. The tolerance ring including an annular band of resilient material having a plurality of projections projecting radially therefrom. Additionally, the method includes moving the other of the inner or outer component with respect to the constrained tolerance ring so as to compress the projections of the tolerance ring between the inner and outer components, and continuing movement of the inner or outer component, respectively, beyond the projections. The method further including measuring a force required for continuing movement, and using the force for process control.