Tollgate-Aware Inertia Driving Control for Electrified Vehicles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for controlling inertia driving in electrified vehicles do not effectively adjust vehicle speed based on the type of tollgate, leading to inefficient fuel usage.

Innovation Solution

A method that uses a controller to determine a target speed for inertia driving of an electrified vehicle based on the type of tollgate encountered, such as general, non-stop, wide, open, or closed tollgates, and adjusts the drive motor accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If the vehicle maintains constant speed through tollgates, then travel time is reduced, but fuel efficiency deteriorates due to unnecessary acceleration and deceleration cycles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetravel time through tollgateVSAvoidfuel efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The controller identifies tollgate locations in advance using navigation information and pre-calculates optimal speed adjustment strategies. The system determines deceleration zones before the vehicle reaches them, allowing smooth speed reduction without sudden braking, thereby recovering kinetic energy through regenerative braking and improving fuel efficiency while still maintaining timely passage through tollgates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the vehicle's speed profile based on real-time conditions including distance to tollgate, current speed, and traffic conditions. Rather than maintaining a fixed speed, the controller continuously optimizes speed commands to balance travel time and energy consumption, using inertia driving to coast through deceleration zones when appropriate

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Use of energy by moving object

If the vehicle decelerates early to prepare for tollgate, then fuel efficiency improves through inertia driving, but travel time increases due to extended deceleration period

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel efficiencyVSAvoidtravel time through tollgate
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The controller calculates optimal deceleration timing in advance based on the distance to the tollgate and current vehicle speed. By determining the precise point where deceleration should begin, the system maximizes inertia driving distance while ensuring the vehicle reaches the tollgate at the appropriate speed, thus improving fuel efficiency without excessive travel time penalty

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system adjusts multiple parameters including deceleration rate, target speed, and timing based on real-time vehicle state and environmental conditions. The controller dynamically modifies these parameters to optimize the balance between fuel efficiency and travel time, adapting the deceleration strategy to each specific situation rather than using a fixed approach

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If the vehicle uses regenerative braking at tollgate, then energy is recovered, but braking distance increases due to reduced deceleration force

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy recoveryVSAvoidbraking distance
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The deceleration process is divided into multiple phases: initial deceleration using conventional braking, transition to regenerative braking for energy recovery, and final speed maintenance through inertia driving. This segmentation allows the system to optimize each phase independently, recovering maximum energy while maintaining safe and efficient stopping distance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The controller periodically switches between conventional braking and regenerative braking modes based on vehicle speed, battery charge state, and distance to tollgate. This periodic action optimizes energy recovery by engaging regenerative braking at speeds where it is most effective while using conventional braking when immediate deceleration is required, thus balancing energy recovery with braking distance constraints

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS12344101B2Method of controlling inertia driving of an electrified vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.07.01 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US12344101B2 patent drawing
  • US12344101B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of controlling inertia driving of an electrified vehicle includes: determining, by a controller, a target speed of an electrified vehicle based on a type of tollgate in front of the electrified vehicle; and controlling, by the controller, a drive motor of the electrified vehicle so that the electrified vehicle performs inertia driving to be decelerated to the target speed.