Tomosynthesis AEC Calibration for Wide-Angle Exposure Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wide-angle tomosynthesis systems face challenges in accurately calculating automatic exposure control (AEC) dosage due to variations in x-ray path length and detector count shifts caused by large projection angles, which affect image quality and radiation exposure.

Innovation Solution

The system generates reference detector count maps at various projection angles and uses curve fitting to estimate detector count values, adjusting for heel and angle effects, to calculate the AEC x-ray dosage needed for wide-angle tomosynthesis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If wide-angle tomosynthesis is performed with large projection angles, then image coverage and diagnostic capability are improved, but calculation accuracy of AEC dosage deteriorates due to x-ray path length variations and detector count shifts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage coverageVSAvoidAEC dosage calculation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calibration by acquiring reference images at multiple known projection angles with a known reference mAs value. These reference images are used to pre-calculate calibration factors that account for path length variations and detector count shifts. During actual tomosynthesis, these pre-calibrated factors are applied to accurately determine the mAs at each projection angle without real-time complex calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex real-time mechanical measurement and calculation systems with a computational approach. Instead of using complex hardware to measure and compensate for path length variations, the system uses software-based calibration factors derived from reference images to substitute for direct measurement, simplifying the system while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If conventional AEC methods are used in wide-angle tomosynthesis, then system complexity is reduced, but image quality and radiation exposure control deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces calibration factors as an intermediary element between the reference images and the actual tomosynthesis images. These calibration factors serve as a mediator that translates the known reference mAs values to the actual mAs values at each projection angle, enabling accurate radiation dose control without requiring complex real-time measurement systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary calibration by acquiring reference images at multiple known projection angles with a known reference mAs value. These reference images are used to pre-calculate calibration factors that account for path length variations and detector count shifts. During actual tomosynthesis, these pre-calibrated factors are applied to accurately determine the mAs at each projection angle without real-time complex calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If conventional AEC methods are used in wide-angle tomosynthesis, then device complexity is reduced, but radiation exposure control deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidradiation exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex real-time mechanical measurement and calculation systems with a computational approach. Instead of using complex hardware to measure and compensate for path length variations, the system uses software-based calibration factors derived from reference images to substitute for direct measurement, simplifying the system while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces calibration factors as an intermediary element between the reference images and the actual tomosynthesis images. These calibration factors serve as a mediator that translates the known reference mAs values to the actual mAs values at each projection angle, enabling accurate radiation dose control without requiring complex real-time measurement systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method ensures accurate calculation of AEC dosage, minimizing radiation exposure while maintaining clear image quality for detecting breast abnormalities, even at large projection angles.

Implementation Method 1

x-ray source moves relative to the breast. The x-ray images are then processed into a stack of 2D images

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray radiation: X-Ray

Data Source

PatentEP4551119B1Wide angle automatic exposure control in tomosynthesis
Publication Date: 2026.03.18 HOLOGIC INC
  • EP4551119B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP4551119B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP4551119B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

The present application discloses a system and method to calculate the automatic exposure control (AEC) calibrated dosage for tomosynthesis sweeps. For example, reference images may be acquired, and corresponding reference detector count maps may be generated and stored for a plurality of projection angles using the tomosynthesis imaging system. The tomosynthesis imaging system may then acquire a scout image using a scout dosage, identify the densest region within the scout image, and calculated the average detector count values associated with the densest region. The AEC calibrated dosage can be calculated based on a ratio of the average reference detector count values, corresponding to the detector count values of pixels with a corresponding densest region of the reference image, and the calculated average detector count values.