Cutting Tool Assembly Selection System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Selecting an optimal cutting tool assembly for metalworking operations is challenging due to the large variety of components and complex machining geometries, requiring significant time and expertise from users, who often rely on incomplete information from catalogs or databases.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that allow users to input desired characteristics of the cutting tool assembly or workpiece, matching compatible components from a database to form a tailored cutting tool assembly, reducing the need for extensive user expertise and time by determining and grouping component characteristics for optimal configuration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a user manually searches through multiple catalogs and databases to select cutting tool components, then the user can find compatible components, but the process requires considerable time and labor and is dependent on user expertise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of component selectionVSAvoidtime required for tool assembly selection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic compatibility checking and component matching without requiring user expertise. The processor autonomously determines compatible components by comparing characteristics from the database, eliminating the need for users to manually search catalogs and apply their knowledge of component compatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of searching catalogs and cross-referencing component specifications is replaced by an automated computer-based system. The processor electronically queries the database, performs compatibility analysis, and generates tool assembly recommendations, substituting human cognitive effort with automated information processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of information

If the system provides detailed information about all available cutting tool components and their compatibility, then the user can make informed selections, but the system complexity and data management requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation about component compatibilityVSAvoidcomplexity of selection system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential compatibility information needed for tool assembly selection from the comprehensive database. Rather than presenting all available component data, the processor identifies and presents only those components that are compatible with the selected items, filtering out unnecessary information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The processor acts as an intermediary between the comprehensive component database and the user. It queries the database, processes compatibility relationships, and presents simplified compatibility information, mediating between the complex data structure and the user's selection needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system allows customization of cutting tool assemblies based on specific machining operations, then the tool assembly can be optimized for particular applications, but the number of possible configurations increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization of tool assemblyVSAvoidnumber of component configurations
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows customization at specific local levels (individual component selection) while maintaining overall compatibility. Users can specify desired characteristics for particular positions in the tool assembly (e.g., cutting insert geometry, tool holder type), and the system ensures that selected components are compatible with each other and the intended machining operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-establishes compatibility relationships in the database before the user performs selections. Compatibility rules, component specifications, and machining operation requirements are pre-programmed, allowing the processor to quickly determine valid configurations without evaluating all possible combinations in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10754322B2System and method for selecting a tool assembly
Publication Date: 2020.08.25 KENNAMETAL INC
  • US10754322B2 patent drawing
  • US10754322B2 patent drawing
  • US10754322B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of identifying a multi-component cutting tool assembly to a user includes the steps of: receiving an indication from the user of a desired characteristic of at least one of the cutting tool assembly or of a workpiece to be machined, determining at least a portion of a first set of characteristics associated with a first component of the plurality of tool components corresponds to the desired characteristic, determining at least a portion of a second set of characteristics associated with a second component of the plurality of tool components corresponds to a portion of the first set of characteristics and responsive thereto grouping the first component and the second component together to form a combination and identifying the combination to the user as the cutting tool assembly.