Tool Container with Composite Cushioning for Impact Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing tool containers fail to effectively cushion and stabilize metal hand tools against impacts, reduce rattling noises, and provide tactile feedback during closure, while also being sensitive to Foreign Object Damage (FOD) due to lack of adequate cushioning and frictional support.

Innovation Solution

A tool container made of two injection-molded plastics materials, where a relatively soft material is used for cushioning and friction, combined with a rigid material for strength, featuring tool supports with cushions that protrude from the shell bodies to provide three-axis stability and visibility through windows, and a locking mechanism that prevents accidental damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a rigid plastics material is used for the shell body, then strength and durability are improved, but cushioning capability and frictional contact are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshell strengthVSAvoidimpact damage to tools
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by combining a rigid first plastics material for the shell body with a soft second plastics material for the tool support cushion. This composite structure allows the rigid material to provide structural strength while the soft material provides impact cushioning and frictional contact, resolving the contradiction between strength and cushioning capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Object-affected harmful factors

If a soft plastics material is used for cushioning, then impact protection is improved, but structural strength and stability are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact protectionVSAvoidstructural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a composite material structure where the soft second plastics material forms the tool support cushion embedded in the rigid first plastics material shell. This allows the soft material to provide impact protection while the rigid composite structure maintains overall structural strength and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Stability of the object's composition

If tool supports are added to hold tools, then tool stability is improved, but rattling noises and impact risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool stabilityVSAvoidrattling noises
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making the tool support cushion specifically soft and compliant at the contact points with tools, while the rest of the shell remains rigid. This localized softness provides cushioning and reduces rattling noises exactly where tools contact the container, without compromising overall structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If the container is made to close tightly, then tool security is improved, but tactile feedback during closure is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool securityVSAvoidtactile feedback
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates feedback by designing the soft second plastics material tool support cushion to provide tactile feedback during the closure process. As the lid closes, the soft cushion deforms and provides sensory feedback to the user, allowing them to feel when full closure is approaching, thus improving ease of operation while maintaining reliable tool security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The tool container effectively cushions hand tools against impacts, reduces rattling noises, provides tactile feedback during closure, and enhances visibility and stability, while minimizing Foreign Object Damage by using fluorescent markings and a secure locking mechanism.

Implementation Method 1

Natural resilience of the tool supports' second material cushions the hand tools against impacts caused by accidental collisions with the tool container

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

A second relatively soft plastics material, attached externally to the first material, may be used to provide a softer touch and improves frictional contact and stability of the tool container when rested on a surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 3

Natural resilience of the second material may provide a soft closure of the first shell against the second shell as the hand tools are clasped between the tool supports

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic Recovery: Elastic Recovery

Data Source

PatentEP2910346B1A tool container
Publication Date: 2021.08.18 STANLEY WORKS (EUROPE) GMBH
  • EP2910346B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2910346B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2910346B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

A tool container (10) comprising: a first shell (20) comprising a shell body (22) of a first plastics material; a second shell (40) comprising a shell body (42) of the first material; and a locking mechanism (70, 72, 74). The first shell is coupled to the second shell by means of a hinge (60) to rotate between open and closed positions. The tool container comprises tool supports (202, 204, 212, 213, 214, 215, 222, 223, 224, 232, 233, 234, 242, 243, 248, 249) arranged to clasp a respective hand tool between the first and second shells of the tool container in the closed position. The supports comprise a cushion (202b, 204c, 212b, 213b, 222b, 223b, 232b, 233b, 242b, 243b, 248b, 249b) of second plastics material of one of the first shell or the second shell. The second material is relatively soft in relation to the first material.