Additively Manufactured Tool Damping Structures for Chatter Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing damping solutions for metal cutting tools, such as boring bars, face limitations in reducing unwanted vibrations due to material stiffness, space restrictions, and high system costs, especially when using active dampers or separately manufactured damping components.

Innovation Solution

The integration of additively manufactured passive damping structures directly into the cutting tool body, which can include lamella layers, spring-mass dampers, and viscoelastic energy-dissipating dampers, formed from various materials like steel, tungsten carbide, or polymer, to provide effective vibration mitigation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If separately manufactured damping components are assembled with cutting tools after manufacture, then damping functionality is added, but additional costs and minimum size constraints are incurred

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration reduction capabilityVSAvoidassembly complexity and minimum tool size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The damping structure is merged with the tool body into a single integrated component. The tool body itself is designed with damping features (such as cavities, ribs, or specific geometric patterns) that provide vibration reduction functionality, eliminating the need for separate damping components and their associated assembly processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The tool body serves multiple functions: it provides structural support for cutting operations and simultaneously acts as a damping structure to reduce vibrations. This multi-functionality is achieved by incorporating damping features directly into the tool body's geometry, allowing one component to fulfill both mechanical and vibration control roles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If active dampers are used to mitigate unwanted vibrations, then vibration control is improved, but system costs and space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration control capabilityVSAvoidsystem cost and space requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tool body provides its own vibration control functionality through passive damping features integrated into its structure. These features automatically dissipate vibration energy without requiring external power sources, control systems, or additional active components, making the system self-sufficient for vibration mitigation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs passive damping materials or structures that are simpler and more cost-effective than active dampers. These passive features (such as viscoelastic materials or geometric damping elements) provide adequate vibration control for the tool's service life without the high costs and complexity of active systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Ease of operation

If long and narrow tools are used for machining, then access to workpiece features is improved, but unwanted vibrations increase due to dynamic compliance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess to workpieceVSAvoidvibration and chatter
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The tool body incorporates localized damping features at specific positions along its length, particularly in regions prone to vibration. These local damping elements (such as strategically placed ribs, cavities, or material variations) target specific vibration modes without requiring changes to the entire tool structure, maintaining the long and narrow geometry needed for access while reducing vibrations locally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables efficient vibration reduction in metal cutting tools by integrating damping structures within the tool body, reducing costs and size constraints, while maintaining tool stiffness and performance.

Implementation Method 1

the one or more dampers includes one or more viscoelastic energy-dissipating dampers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscoelasticity: Viscoelasticity

Implementation Method 2

the one or more dampers includes one or more spring-mass dampers integrated in the interior space of the tool body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 3

one or more additively manufactured passive dampers are disposed in the interior space of the tool body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDamping: Damping

Data Source

PatentUS20250153248A1Additively Manufactured Passive Damping Structures for Metal Cutting
Publication Date: 2025.05.15 KENNAMETAL INC
  • US20250153248A1 patent drawing
  • US20250153248A1 patent drawing
  • US20250153248A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A cutting tool has a tool body with a proximal end for mounting to drive unit and a distal end for engaging a workpiece for cutting. The tool body extends longitudinally along a central axis of the tool body. The tool body defines an interior space therein. One or more additively manufactured passive dampers are disposed in the interior space of the tool body.