Tool Experience Aggregator for Objective Skill Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for assessing user skill and experience with tools like cameras, lathes, and musical instruments rely on subjective word-of-mouth and reviews, lacking objective measurement and aggregation of user data.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for aggregating and analyzing user experience data by equipping tools with sensors to record user actions, authenticate users, and transmit data to an aggregating system that generates user experience and skill metrics, enabling objective ranking and analytics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If word-of-mouth and reviews are used to assess user skill, then the method is simple to implement, but the measurement precision is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser skill assessment accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary system consisting of sensors, data processors, and aggregation servers that objectively collect and analyze tool usage data. This intermediary infrastructure transforms subjective reviews into objective measurements by capturing actual tool interactions, usage patterns, and performance metrics, thereby resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/social mechanism of word-of-mouth reviews with an automated digital system. Sensors automatically capture tool usage data, and computational algorithms process this data to generate skill assessments, eliminating the need for manual evaluations and achieving precise, scalable measurement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If objective data collection is implemented, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser experience measurement accuracyVSAvoiddata collection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the data collection system into modular components: sensors attached to tools, data processing units, communication modules, and aggregation servers. This segmentation allows each component to perform a specific function independently, making the overall complex system manageable and implementable through standardized modules

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent designs a universal data collection framework that can be applied across different tool types (cameras, musical instruments, machinery). The same sensor suite and data processing architecture serve multiple purposes, reducing overall system complexity through reuse and standardization while maintaining high measurement precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If comprehensive user experience data is aggregated, then the quality of assessment improves, but loss of information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment reliabilityVSAvoiddata processing information loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the relevant and useful information from the vast amount of raw tool usage data. By identifying and isolating key metrics such as usage frequency, skill level indicators, and performance outcomes, the system maintains assessment reliability while filtering out redundant or noisy information that would cause data overload

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary data cleaning, validation, and structuring at the point of collection. Sensors are pre-configured to capture only relevant parameters, and data is pre-processed to remove errors and inconsistencies before aggregation, preventing information loss during subsequent processing stages

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10572839B2Tool experience aggregator
Publication Date: 2020.02.25 INTEL CORP
  • US10572839B2 patent drawing
  • US10572839B2 patent drawing
  • US10572839B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various examples are directed to systems and methods for aggregating user tool experience. A record ingestion circuit may receive action record data from a user tool that describes an action performed with the user tool by the user. The record ingestion circuit may also receive user name data describing the user. A record analytics circuit may generate user experience data for the user describing a plurality of actions performed by the user with the user tool. An application programming interface (API) circuit may receive from a requesting application a query for data describing the plurality of actions and send to the requesting application the data describing the plurality of actions.