Tool Feature Surfacing via Interaction Pattern Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Software and hardware development tools often have underutilized features that developers are not aware of or do not use efficiently, leading to inefficiencies in user interactions, increased error risk, and reduced productivity.

Innovation Solution

A system that detects user interaction patterns and automatically maps them to optimized interaction suggestions, offering users a more efficient way to achieve desired results by reducing the number of gestures, tools, and errors, while improving security and speed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If developers use traditional development tools with manual interaction, then they can access basic tool functionality, but they fail to discover and utilize underutilized features, leading to reduced productivity and increased interaction complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeveloper productivityVSAvoidinteraction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors user interactions with development tools and provides feedback by suggesting optimized interaction patterns. The feedback loop captures interaction data, analyzes it against a knowledge base of tool features, and presents personalized suggestions to developers, enabling them to discover and adopt more efficient ways to use tool features without increasing interaction complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables developers to self-optimize their workflow by automatically analyzing their interaction patterns and providing tailored suggestions for utilizing underused tool features. Rather than requiring formal training or manual configuration, the system serves itself by learning from user behavior and autonomously generating optimization recommendations that adapt to individual developer needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If developers manually explore and learn tool features, then they can discover new capabilities, but it requires significant time and effort, reducing overall工作效率

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool feature utilizationVSAvoidtime for learning and discovery
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of the developer's interaction patterns and pre-processes this data against the knowledge base of tool features before the developer needs to learn anything. By proactively identifying underutilized features and preparing personalized suggestions in advance, the system eliminates the need for time-consuming manual exploration and learning, delivering ready-to-apply optimization recommendations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system acts as an intermediary between the developer and the development tools' feature set. Rather than requiring direct interaction between the developer and the complex tool features, the system mediates this relationship by analyzing interactions, matching them against the knowledge base, and translating raw tool capabilities into personalized, context-aware suggestions that are easy to understand and apply

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If the system provides comprehensive suggestions for all tool features, then users can discover more capabilities, but it may overwhelm users with too many suggestions and distract from their primary workflow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of tool feature discoveryVSAvoidsuggestion system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by providing suggestions that are specifically tailored to each developer's local context, including their current task, interaction patterns, and skill level. Rather than providing uniform comprehensive suggestions to all users, the system localizes recommendations to match individual needs and contexts, ensuring suggestions are relevant and non-intrusive while maintaining ease of discovery

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Productivity

If the system automatically analyzes user interactions, then it can identify optimization opportunities, but it requires processing and storing interaction data, increasing system resource requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinteraction efficiencyVSAvoidsystem resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential and relevant features from the complex stream of user interactions with development tools. Rather than processing and storing all interaction data in its entirety, the system extracts key interaction patterns and characteristics that are most useful for identifying optimization opportunities, thereby reducing the computational resources required for analysis while maintaining the ability to improve interaction efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS11714613B2Surfacing underutilized tool features
Publication Date: 2023.08.01 MICROSOFT CORP
  • US11714613B2 patent drawing
  • US11714613B2 patent drawing
  • US11714613B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments automate surfacing of underutilized development tool features, thereby enhancing the discoverability of subtools, commands, shortcuts, settings, visualizers, and other tool features. After spotting an inefficiency in the user's interaction with one or more tools, the feature surfacing functionality offers the user an interaction optimization suggestion. A mapping structure correlates detected interaction patterns with objectively better interaction optimizations. Several examples of mappings are discussed. The user can accept a suggestion, have the suggested optimization applied by an enhanced tool, and thereby reduce the number of user gestures utilized to accomplish a desired result, reduce the number of tools utilized, increase security, reduce risk of error, or get to the desired result faster, for example. Interaction optimizations also help the user stay focused, by reducing or avoiding departures from the user's current primary workflow. Other aspects of tool feature surfacing functionality are also described herein.