Tool Holder Insert Pocket V-Shaped Geometry

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cutting tool holders are limited in accommodating multiple differently-shaped indexable cutting inserts, which complicates the geometry of insert pockets and can lead to premature dulling or damage of cutting edges, especially with double-sided inserts that have complex geometries.

Innovation Solution

The development of versatile insert pocket configurations in tool holders that can securely engage and support multiple differently-shaped cutting inserts, including round, polygonal, and other shapes, using a single structural geometry that accommodates both single-sided and double-sided inserts, with insert-engaging pocket walls that form a V-shaped angle to securely position and support the inserts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the insert pocket geometry is complicated to accommodate multiple differently-shaped cutting inserts, then the versatility of the tool holder is improved, but the cutting edges are more prone to premature dulling or damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveversatility of tool holderVSAvoidcutting edge durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The insert pocket is segmented into multiple functional surfaces: a seat face for supporting the insert, and multiple inclined pocket walls forming a V-shaped configuration. This segmentation allows each surface to perform a specific function - the seat face provides stable support while the inclined walls provide geometric engagement differentially shaped inserts, resolving the contradiction between versatility and cutting edge protection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the insert pocket are given different geometric properties - the seat face is configured to engage specific surfaces of the insert while the inclined pocket walls are configured to engage other surfaces. This local differentiation allows the same pocket to accommodate multiple insert shapes without compromising cutting edge integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If multiple differently-shaped cutting inserts are accommodated in a single tool holder, then the productivity is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool holder efficiencyVSAvoidinsert pocket geometry
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The insert pocket is designed with universal engagement features - the V-shaped configuration formed by multiple inclined walls can geometrically engage various insert shapes (round, square, rectangular, etc.) through different combinations of the same basic surfaces. This multi-functional design allows a single tool holder to accommodate multiple insert types without requiring complex specialized pockets for each shape

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of designing different complex pocket geometries for different insert shapes, the invention inverts the approach by using a standardized V-shaped pocket configuration that passively adapts to different insert geometries. The inclined walls are arranged to naturally conform to various insert shapes, simplifying the device structure while maintaining versatility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentUS8807884B2Tool holder for multiple differently-shaped cutting inserts
Publication Date: 2014.08.19 KENNAMETAL INC
  • US8807884B2 patent drawing
  • US8807884B2 patent drawing
  • US8807884B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Insert pockets of tool holders configured to accommodate multiple differently-shaped cutting inserts are disclosed. Cutting tool holders and cutting tool systems are also disclosed.