Weighted Tool Path Evaluation for Targeted Path Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current technologies lack the ability to determine which evaluation items require optimization for a tool path and to optimize them effectively, given multiple evaluation indices.

Innovation Solution

An optimization device and program that analyze and evaluate tool paths based on multiple evaluation items, normalize the results according to weightings, determine if adjustments are needed, and perform path adjustments accordingly, focusing on items requiring improvement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple evaluation indices are used to assess tool path quality, then the comprehensiveness of evaluation is improved, but the complexity of determining which items require optimization increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation comprehensivenessVSAvoidoptimization determination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a determination unit as an intermediary component that receives multiple evaluation indices from the analysis/evaluation unit and processes them to identify which specific evaluation items require optimization. This intermediary structure simplifies the overall system by centralizing the complex determination logic in a dedicated component, making the system manageable despite handling multiple evaluation criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the determination unit analyzes evaluation results and provides guidance back to the path adjustment unit. The determination unit compares actual evaluation values against reference values and feeds back specific information about which evaluation items need optimization, enabling targeted adjustments rather than comprehensive re-optimization of all parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If all evaluation items are optimized, then the overall tool path quality is improved, but the machining time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool path qualityVSAvoidmachining efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and identifies only the specific evaluation items that require optimization from the complete set of evaluation indices. The determination unit compares actual values against reference values and extracts only those items with significant deviations, allowing the system to focus optimization efforts on critical parameters rather than all parameters, thereby reducing computational overhead and machining time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of optimizing all evaluation items comprehensively, the system applies partial optimization by selecting only the necessary evaluation items that require adjustment. This partial action approach achieves sufficient tool path quality improvement without the excessive computational resources and time that would be required to optimize every evaluation parameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Manufacturing precision

If the tool path is adjusted based on comprehensive evaluation, then the machining accuracy is improved, but the complexity of path adjustment increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining accuracyVSAvoidpath adjustment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making path adjustments specific to particular evaluation items that require optimization rather than applying uniform adjustments across the entire tool path. The path adjustment unit receives targeted guidance from the determination unit about which specific aspects need improvement and applies localized adjustments only to those areas, simplifying the overall adjustment process while maintaining high machining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20230367268A1Optimization device and optimization program for tool path
Publication Date: 2023.11.16 FANUC LTD
  • US20230367268A1 patent drawing
  • US20230367268A1 patent drawing
  • US20230367268A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An optimization device includes a tool path, an analysis/evaluation unit for inputting one or more evaluation indices each including an evaluation item and weighting, analyzing and evaluating the tool path for each evaluation item, and outputting one or more analysis/evaluation results, and a normalization unit that normalizes the analysis/evaluation results considering the weighting, and outputs one or more normalized analysis/evaluation results. The optimization device also includes a determination unit for inputting a determination criterion, and determining the necessity of path adjustment based on the determination criterion and the normalized analysis/evaluation results such that, when a path adjustment is required, a determination result is outputted including either the normalized analysis/evaluation results or an item requiring adjustment selected from the evaluation items, and a path adjustment unit that performs an adjustment of the tool path based on the determination result, and outputs a path adjustment result including the adjusted tool path.