Tool Selection System With Compatibility Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The current process for selecting tools to fit digging machines is inefficient, involving multiple interactions with sales representatives, engineers, and dealers, leading to increased time and costs, incorrect specifications, and sub-optimal tool selection due to lack of compatibility assessment.

Innovation Solution

A system and method using a graphical user interface (GUI) to input machine and tool parameters, determining compatible tools based on compatibility, and presenting a graphical representation of candidate tools with their fitness indicators, allowing users to select suitable tools directly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the current manual tool selection process is used, then human expertise and interaction are available to guide selection, but the process requires multiple interactions with sales representatives, engineers, and dealers, increasing time and costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool selection processVSAvoidtool selection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables customers to independently select appropriate tools by automatically comparing their machine specifications with tool requirements through a computer interface, eliminating the need for multiple interactions with sales representatives, engineers, and dealers while reducing selection time and costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual expert-guided selection process is replaced by an automated computer-based system that uses algorithms to compare machine and tool specifications, substituting human mechanical interaction with automated electronic processing to reduce time and cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If the current manual tool selection process is used, then human judgment is available, but incorrect specifications such as load ratings, sizes, dimensions, or payload size may be selected, reducing compatibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool specification accuracyVSAvoidcompatibility assessment system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically compares machine specifications with tool requirements and provides real-time feedback on compatibility, ensuring correct specifications are selected by highlighting mismatches in load ratings, sizes, dimensions, or payload size before final selection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The computer-based system acts as an intermediary between the customer and the tool selection process, automatically comparing specifications and determining compatibility, thereby eliminating human error in specification selection without requiring complex manual assessment procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If automated tool selection is implemented, then time and costs are reduced, but the system must accurately assess compatibility between machines and tools

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool selection efficiencyVSAvoidcompatibility assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary comparison of machine and tool specifications before final selection, automatically assessing compatibility factors such as load ratings, sizes, dimensions, and payload size to ensure accurate matching while maintaining high selection efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system evaluates multiple specification parameters simultaneously (load ratings, sizes, dimensions, payload size) and automatically determines compatibility by comparing these parameters against established requirements, achieving both speed and precision in tool selection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11079921B1Tool selection systems
Publication Date: 2021.08.03 CATERPILLAR INC
  • US11079921B1 patent drawing
  • US11079921B1 patent drawing
  • US11079921B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes, with a processor executing computer-readable instructions stored within a memory device, displaying, on a display device and via at least one graphical user interface (GUI), a first interface element associated with a machine selection, receiving, via the first interface element, a first input comprising an indication of a machine, displaying, on the display device and via the at least one GUI, one or more second interface elements associated with tool parameters, receiving, via the second interface element, a second input comprising an indication of the tool parameters, determining, based at least in part on the machine and the tool parameters, one or more tools for use with the machine, and presenting, via the at least one GUI, a graphical representation of the one or more tools.