Production Tool Tracking With Asset Tags for Incident Accountability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current tool control programs face challenges in tracking production tools with sharp edges, such as knives and scissors, across production lines and employees, leading to difficulties in identifying and addressing incidents like breakage or contamination, which can result in costly recalls and safety risks.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for real-time tracking of production tools using unique asset numbers linked to QR codes or RFID tags, allowing for continuous monitoring from issuance to return, with data management software that logs critical events like damage, breakage, or reassignment, enabling automatic alerts and improved accountability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional tool control programs are used with manual tracking methods, then implementation cost is low, but tracking precision and real-time monitoring capability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses universal asset tags that can be attached to any production tool, and a multi-functional software platform that handles tracking, incident reporting, corrective measures, and analytics across different tool types and production lines, eliminating the need for separate tracking systems for each tool category

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces asset tags (QR codes, barcodes, RFID tags) as intermediaries attached to tools, and a centralized software platform as an intermediary that mediates between multiple users, devices, and data sources, enabling precise tracking without direct complex connections between all system components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of time

If real-time tracking systems are implemented with comprehensive monitoring, then incident response speed is improved, but device complexity and implementation cost worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveincident response timeVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors tool status and provides real-time feedback through automatic alerts when incidents are detected or reported, enabling immediate response. The software tracks tool location, status changes, and incident reports, providing feedback loops that accelerate incident resolution while maintaining manageable system complexity through automated workflows

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring tool assignments to production lines and employees, establishing baseline tracking parameters before incidents occur. Incident reporting templates and corrective measure protocols are prepared in advance, enabling rapid response when incidents are detected without requiring complex real-time decision-making structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If manual incident reporting methods are used, then system simplicity is maintained, but productivity and corrective measure implementation worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrective measure implementation efficiencyVSAvoidtime to process incident reports
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service incident reporting where employees can directly submit incident reports through mobile devices or workstations, and the software automatically routes reports to appropriate supervisors and tracks corrective measure implementation. This eliminates manual report collection and processing, significantly improving productivity while reducing the time lost in traditional hierarchical reporting structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Loss of information

If tools are tracked across multiple production lines and employees, then asset visibility is improved, but difficulty of detecting and measuring incidents worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveasset visibilityVSAvoidincident detection difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments tool tracking by assigning unique asset tags to individual tools and organizing them hierarchically under production lines, stations, and employees. The software interface segments incident reports and analytics by these same categories, enabling comprehensive asset visibility across the entire organization while making incident detection manageable through organized, segmented data presentation rather than overwhelming aggregated data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11900209B2Tool control program system and method of tool control
Publication Date: 2024.02.13 INNOVA ZONES LLC
  • US11900209B2 patent drawing
  • US11900209B2 patent drawing
  • US11900209B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method of a tool control program that provides real-time tracking of critical data points relating to production tools between the point of issuance to a designated user to the point of return of each production tool by the designated user, including intermediate events such as sharpening, repair and damage analysis, whereby each critical data point is capable of being linked to a unique asset number assigned to each production tool and a unique designated user number in real-time providing for management, regulatory compliance and/or employee accountability relating to each production tool. The tool control program having an integrated software relating to scanning production tools in relation to the critical data points, such that real-time data analytics can be obtained and utilized for risk management and asset visibility.