Tool Wear Estimation Using Clustering for Predictive Maintenance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for estimating component wear in machinery are inefficient and inaccurate, often requiring costly and time-consuming offline measurements, which can lead to unnecessary inspections and premature tool disposal, especially in machining processes where tool wear is unpredictable and varies significantly due to complex conditions.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using clustering analysis, specifically Dirichlet Process Mixture Models (DPMMs), to identify changes in component wear by analyzing real-time measurements of parameters like acoustic emission, temperature, and force during tool use, allowing for predictive maintenance and reducing downtime by generating alerts for necessary inspections.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If time-based maintenance strategy is used to discard tools at set times, then safety and reliability are improved, but productivity and resource utilization deteriorate due to premature tool disposal with 50-80% useful life remaining

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidresource utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from time-based maintenance (fixed schedule) to condition-based maintenance (real-time wear state monitoring) by changing the maintenance parameter from time to actual wear condition. This is achieved through continuous monitoring of machining parameters and using machine learning models to estimate tool wear state, allowing tools to be used until actual wear limits are reached rather than discarding them prematurely based on time schedules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/time-based maintenance system with an intelligent monitoring and prediction system. Instead of relying on fixed time schedules, the system uses sensors to collect machining data and machine learning algorithms (including clustering analysis and neural networks) to predict tool wear and remaining useful life, substituting mechanical judgment with computational intelligence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If offline wear measurement using optical microscopy is used, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time and productivity deteriorate due to tool removal and repositioning requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear measurement accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces machining parameters (current, voltage, power, acoustic emission, vibration) as intermediary indicators of tool wear. Instead of directly measuring tool geometry offline, the system uses these readily available process parameters as proxies for wear state, which can be monitored continuously without removing the tool. Machine learning models correlate these intermediary measurements with actual wear conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces direct mechanical measurement methods (optical microscopy requiring tool removal) with indirect sensing and computational analysis. Sensors monitor machining parameters continuously, and machine learning algorithms process this data to estimate wear, substituting physical measurement with intelligent inference from process data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If tool position is changed between machining cycles for measurement, then measurement accessibility is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to positional differences affecting cutting conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement accessibilityVSAvoidcutting condition consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables continuous monitoring of tool wear during machining operations without interrupting the cutting process. Tools remain in position and continue machining while sensors continuously collect data, eliminating the stop-start nature of offline measurement and maintaining consistent cutting conditions throughout the monitoring period.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses machining parameters as intermediary indicators that can be measured without moving the tool. These parameters serve as proxies for wear state, allowing wear assessment while the tool remains in its machining position, thus avoiding the need to change tool position for measurement purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Device complexity

If supervised machine learning with pre-defined clusters is used, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision and adaptability deteriorate due to inability to capture unpredictable wear patterns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel simplicityVSAvoidwear estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic clustering methods (including Dirichlet process mixture models and adaptive neural networks) that can automatically adjust the number and characteristics of wear state clusters based on the data. Instead of using fixed, pre-defined clusters, the system dynamically creates clusters that adapt to the actual wear patterns observed, capturing unpredictable wear behaviors while maintaining model interpretability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses unsupervised learning and clustering analysis to preliminarily identify wear state patterns and cluster structures from historical data before applying supervised prediction models. This preliminary exploration of data structure enables the system to adapt to specific wear patterns without requiring pre-defined cluster assumptions, improving both accuracy and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240201651A1Methods for estimating component wear
Publication Date: 2024.06.20 ELEMENT SIX (UK) LTD
  • US20240201651A1 patent drawing
  • US20240201651A1 patent drawing
  • US20240201651A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure relates to a computer-implemented method for estimating component wear. At least one clustering analysis may be applied to measurements taken during component use to identify clusters and generate alerts.