Toolholder Assembly Non-Circular Shank Quick-Change Locking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing tooling systems for machine tools require significant downtime for changing damaged or worn-out cutting tools due to the need to remove and replace the entire toolholder, and there is a need for improved systems with increased strength and durability.

Innovation Solution

A toolholder assembly with a non-circular cross-section toolholder shank and base member, a canister with locking passageways, a lock rod with depressions, and a locking member that allows for quick and secure attachment and detachment, providing high clamping and torsional stiffness through tri-lobe configurations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the entire toolholder is removed and replaced when the cutting tool needs to be replaced, then the cutting tool can be changed, but the machine downtime increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining efficiencyVSAvoidtool change downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The toolholder assembly is segmented into a toolholder portion and a base member portion that can be quickly disconnected and reconnected. The quick-change mechanism allows the toolholder to be separated from the base member without removing the entire assembly, enabling rapid tool replacement while maintaining the structural integrity and positioning accuracy of the base member.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The locking and unlocking mechanisms are pre-positioned and ready for immediate action. The quick-change system includes pre-aligned locking apertures, locking balls, and actuating elements that enable the toolholder to be secured or released with a single motion, eliminating the need for multiple adjustment steps during tool changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of time

If a quick change tooling system is used to reduce downtime, then tool change time decreases, but the strength and durability of the tooling system may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool change downtimeVSAvoidtooling system strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism employs an asymmetric design with locking balls that engage into specifically shaped locking apertures. This asymmetric geometry provides mechanical advantage and ensures positive locking with high strength, while the actuating element provides symmetric control for easy operation. The non-circular cross-section of the toolholder shank also contributes to asymmetric engagement that enhances torsional stiffness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

Spherical locking balls are used to engage with the locking apertures, providing point contact that concentrates locking forces and ensures reliable engagement. The spherical shape allows for self-alignment and smooth transition between locked and unlocked states while maintaining high contact strength during the locked position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Strength

If a locking mechanism with multiple components is used to increase strength, then the tooling system becomes more durable, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclamping forceVSAvoidlocking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism merges multiple functions into integrated components. The actuating element simultaneously performs the functions of unlocking the locking balls, retracting the lock rod, and positioning the toolholder for removal. The locking balls serve both as locking elements and as indicators of the locked state. This merging reduces the number of separate components while maintaining high clamping force and torsional stiffness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If a locking mechanism with multiple components is used to increase durability, then the tooling system becomes more reliable, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetooling system reliabilityVSAvoidlocking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is designed to be self-actuating and self-locking. When the actuating element is moved to the locked position, it automatically drives the lock rod forward to engage the locking balls with the locking apertures, securing the toolholder without requiring additional adjustment or verification steps. The geometry of the locking apertures and locking balls ensures that once engaged, the connection maintains its integrity under cutting forces without additional active control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9669468B2Toolholder assembly
Publication Date: 2017.06.06 KENNAMETAL INC
  • US9669468B2 patent drawing
  • US9669468B2 patent drawing
  • US9669468B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A toolholder assembly includes a toolholder having a toolholder shank with a non-circular cross-section, a base member having a bore with a non-circular cross-section that receives the toolholder shank, a canister positioned in the base member, a lock rod positioned in the canister, a locking ball for cooperating with the lock rod, the canister and/or the toolholder shank and an actuating element configured for cooperation with the lock rod for moving the lock rod between a locked position and an unlocked position.