Toolholder Pocket Geometry for Mixed Clearance Angle Inserts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing rotary cutting tools require separate toolholders for positive and negative style cutting inserts, increasing costs due to the need for dual toolholder types.

Innovation Solution

The toolholder design incorporates seating pads with angled surfaces to accommodate both positive and negative style cutting inserts, allowing for a single toolholder to support both types by adjusting the angles of the support pads to match different clearance angles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a toolholder is designed for positive style cutting inserts with high clearance angles, then it accommodates inserts for certain materials like high temperature alloys, but it cannot accommodate negative style cutting inserts with smaller clearance angles without causing spring back

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with different cutting insert stylesVSAvoidmounting stability of cutting inserts
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The toolholder is designed with a universal pocket structure that can accommodate both positive style cutting inserts with high clearance angles and negative style cutting inserts with smaller clearance angles. The pocket includes a bottom floor and side walls configured to provide stable support for different insert geometries, eliminating the need for separate toolholders for different insert styles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The pocket structure incorporates localized features with different geometric properties: the bottom floor has a first configuration optimized for positive style inserts, while the side walls include second configurations specifically designed to support negative style inserts. This local differentiation within the unified pocket structure enables compatibility with both insert types while maintaining mounting stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If separate toolholders are used for positive and negative style cutting inserts, then each insert type has optimal mounting stability, but the cost increases due to requiring two different types of toolholders

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting stability of cutting insertsVSAvoidnumber of toolholder types required
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention consolidates the need for multiple toolholder types into a single universal toolholder design. The pocket structure integrates features that provide optimal mounting stability for both positive style inserts (with high clearance angles) and negative style inserts (with smaller clearance angles), reducing the total number of toolholder variants required in the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The design merges the previously separate toolholder configurations into a single integrated pocket structure. The bottom floor and side walls are configured to simultaneously provide the structural support needed for different insert styles, combining the functions of what were previously separate toolholders into one unified component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11484953B2Tool holder with pocket for accommodating cutting inserts with different clearance angles
Publication Date: 2022.11.01 KENNAMETAL INDIA
  • US11484953B2 patent drawing
  • US11484953B2 patent drawing
  • US11484953B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A toolholder (10) has a pocket (20) that accommodates two styles of cutting inserts (25, 25′) having different clearance angles (CA). A support pad (78, 80) protrudes from two side walls (82, 84) of the pocket (20). Each support pad (78, 80) includes a first, planar wall (78a, 80a) and a second, planar wall (78b, 80b) formed at a composite angle defined by a first angle (92) and a second angle (94). The first, planar wall (78a, 80a) enables the pocket (20) to accommodate the second style of cutting insert (25′), and the second, planar wall (78b, 80b) enables the pocket (20) to accommodate the first style of cutting insert (25). In one aspect, the support pads (78, 80) extend the entire length, L, of the support pad (78, 80). In another aspect, an indentation (112, 114) divides one or both of the support pads (178, 180) into two portions, each portion having two planar walls (178a, 178b, 178c, 178d, 180a, 180b, 180c, 180d).