Machining Toolpath Layout to Avoid Thin Walls Around Islands

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Machining methods, such as adaptive roughing, risk forming thin walls during the machining of parts with islands, leading to fragile cutting conditions and potential tool damage.

Innovation Solution

A method determining the optimal path for a machining tool by selecting angularly offset advancement vectors, calculating machining areas, and verifying parameters to avoid thin wall formation, using a computer program to ensure passes are made in straight lines perpendicular to the optimal vector, thereby maximizing material removal while preventing thin walls.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If adaptive roughing method is used to machine parts with islands, then material removal efficiency is improved, but thin walls are formed which are too fragile and cause vibrations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial removal efficiencyVSAvoidcutting conditions stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The method segments the machining area into multiple zones based on the position of islands, and for each zone independently determines an optimal advancement vector that avoids creating thin walls. This segmentation allows the toolpath to be customized for different regions, ensuring efficient material removal while maintaining structural integrity around islands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies local quality by determining zone-specific advancement vectors rather than using a uniform approach throughout the entire machining area. Each zone's optimal vector is calculated based on its local geometry and island positions, enabling the system to adapt the toolpath to local conditions and avoid thin wall formation in critical areas while maintaining productivity elsewhere.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If tool path is optimized to avoid thin walls, then machining reliability is improved, but machining area coverage may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining stabilityVSAvoidmachining area coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically determines the optimal advancement vector for each zone based on real-time geometric analysis of islands and machining boundaries. This dynamic adaptation allows the toolpath to efficiently cover the machining area while automatically adjusting to avoid thin wall formation, balancing reliability and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the advancement vector parameter for each zone to optimize both area coverage and thin wall avoidance. By calculating and applying zone-specific vectors rather than using a fixed approach, the system maximizes material removal efficiency while maintaining machining stability around islands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3627252B1Method for determining the optimal path of a machining tool to prevent the formation of thin walls
Publication Date: 2022.04.06 GO2CAM INT
  • EP3627252B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3627252B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3627252B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for determining the optimal path of a machining tool for machining at least one island present in at least one zone of an open or closed pocket, said method consisting of determining at least one optimal feed vector (V_opt_j) along which the machining tool will make straight-line passes on said at least one zone, said method comprising, for said at least one zone, the following steps: - Selection of several feed vectors (V_i) of the machining tool angularly offset from each other with respect to a fixed axis (X); - For each chosen feed vector, determination of a machining area (A_i) that will be covered by the tool during straight-line passes; - Comparison of the areas obtained for each feed vector and determination of the optimal feed vector (V_opt_j) for which the machining area is maximized;