Toothbrush Recommendation System Using Questionnaire-Based Bristle Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a lack of technology to assist users in selecting a suitable toothbrush based on their oral condition and brushing habits, leading to inadequate oral hygiene.

Innovation Solution

A toothbrush recommendation apparatus that includes user input and output units, and an operation control unit to determine the number of bristle lines, bristle strength, and shape through questionnaires, recommending a suitable toothbrush type and providing guidance on replacement timing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If users arbitrarily select toothbrushes based on experience or price, then selection process is simple and quick, but toothbrush suitability for oral condition deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetoothbrush selection processVSAvoidtoothbrush suitability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment through questionnaires about oral conditions, brushing habits, and preferences before recommending a toothbrush. This advance evaluation ensures the recommended toothbrush is suitable for the user's specific needs, resolving the contradiction by making the selection process both simple (automatic recommendation) and reliable (based on comprehensive assessment).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables users to self-assess their own oral conditions and preferences through questionnaires, then automatically generates personalized toothbrush recommendations. This self-service approach maintains ease of operation while improving reliability by base recommendations on user-specific data rather than arbitrary selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If comprehensive questionnaires are used to determine toothbrush type, then toothbrush suitability improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetoothbrush recommendation accuracyVSAvoidrecommendation system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The recommendation system is segmented into distinct functional modules: questionnaire management unit, analysis unit, and recommendation generation unit. Each module handles a specific aspect of the recommendation process, making the overall complex system manageable and maintainable while ensuring comprehensive assessment for accurate recommendations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a universal questionnaire framework that can assess multiple aspects of oral conditions, brushing habits, and preferences through a single integrated system. This multi-functional approach covers various determination criteria (bristle hardness, brush head size, shape) without requiring separate systems, balancing comprehensiveness with system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If multiple determination criteria are evaluated, then recommendation precision improves, but information processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoral condition assessmentVSAvoidassessment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a tiered questionnaire approach where essential oral condition criteria are assessed first to provide a basic recommendation, and additional detailed criteria can be optionally assessed for more precise recommendations. This allows users to complete the essential assessment quickly while having the option to provide more information for enhanced precision if needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual evaluation of multiple criteria with automated analysis algorithms that process questionnaire responses efficiently. The analysis unit automatically evaluates multiple determination criteria (bristle hardness, brush head size, shape compatibility) and generates recommendations without manual intervention, reducing processing time while maintaining assessment precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20240078587A1Toothbrush recommendation apparatus and control method therefor
Publication Date: 2024.03.07 MYUNG SUNG CO LTD
  • US20240078587A1 patent drawing
  • US20240078587A1 patent drawing
  • US20240078587A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a toothbrush type recommendation apparatus. The toothbrush type recommendation apparatus comprises: a user input unit; an output unit; and an operation control unit connected to the user input unit and the output unit. The operation control unit outputs a questionnaire to the output unit, the questionnaire including questions for determining the number of lines of bristles, questions for determining bristle strength, and questions for determining bristle shape, receives answers to the questionnaire as input from the user input unit and calculates a score for determining the number of lines of bristles and a score for determining bristle strength, determines the number of lines of bristles and the bristle strength corresponding to the respective calculated scores, determines a final bristle shape as a toothbrush type for the determined bristle strength on the basis of the answers to the questionnaire questions for determining bristle shape, and outputs the selected toothbrush type to the output unit.