Integrated Top Lid Support for Stable Plasma Reaction Space

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The top lid of substrate processing apparatuses sag due to negative pressure and thermal deformation, leading to non-uniform gas flow and plasma distribution, and increased device complexity.

Innovation Solution

A top lid with an integral support formed from the same material as the lid, featuring a cross-shaped design with symmetric protrusions, which minimizes thermal deformation by maintaining a constant distance between gas supply units and substrate supports.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If a support is installed in a vertical direction between the chamber wall and the top lid to prevent sagging, then the top lid deformation is reduced, but the device complexity increases and interference may occur between reactors during substrate transfer

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetop lid deformationVSAvoiddevice configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure is merged with the top lid to form an integral unit. The support protrudes from one surface of the top lid, eliminating the need for separate vertical supports between the chamber wall and top lid. This integration reduces device complexity while maintaining the top lid's stability against sagging during substrate processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The support structure is segmented into multiple protrusions extending from different surfaces of the top lid. These segmented supports distribute the mechanical load and provide stability without requiring a single complex vertical support structure, thereby reducing interference between reactors during substrate transfer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Stability of the object's composition

If the top lid is made thicker to prevent thermal deformation, then the thermal deformation is reduced, but the weight of the top lid increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal deformationVSAvoidtop lid weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure is merged with the top lid material, forming an integral component. This integration allows the support to contribute to both structural stability and thermal resistance without adding separate heavy components. The protruding supports distribute thermal stress more effectively, reducing the need for excessive thickness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The top lid and support are formed from the same material with consistent thermal properties. This material uniformity ensures that thermal expansion and deformation are distributed evenly throughout the integrated structure, preventing localized stress concentrations that would require additional thickness for compensation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Manufacturing precision

If the distance between the gas supply unit and substrate support is maintained constant by tilting the substrate support, then the reaction space distance is maintained, but non-uniform gas flow and plasma distribution occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction space distanceVSAvoidgas flow uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of tilting the substrate support to maintain distance, the invention inverts the approach by making the top lid support structure itself adjustable or compliant. The protruding supports can tilt or deform to compensate for top lid sagging, maintaining the perpendicular alignment of the gas supply unit relative to the substrate support without tilting the substrate support itself

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The support structure is designed with dynamic characteristics that allow it to adapt to thermal and vacuum conditions. The protruding supports can flex or adjust their orientation in response to top lid deformation, automatically maintaining the optimal distance and alignment between the gas supply unit and substrate support without compromising gas flow uniformity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The integrated support maintains a consistent reaction space distance, ensuring uniform gas flow and plasma distribution, reducing process defects and device complexity.

Implementation Method 1

the top lid 3 may sag due to a negative pressure (i.e., vacuum suction power) of the inner space 8 generated by the exhaust unit (not shown) such as a vacuum pump

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNegative pressure (vacuum suction): Vacuum

Implementation Method 2

when a substrate is processed at a high temperature, the top lid 3 may further sag due to thermal deformation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal deformation: Thermal Expansion

Data Source

PatentUS12506021B2Substrate processing apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.12.23 ASM IP HLDG BV
  • US12506021B2 patent drawing
  • US12506021B2 patent drawing
  • US12506021B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A top lid capable of minimizing thermal deformation when a substrate processing temperature increases includes a support for supporting the top lid, the support protruding integrally from one surface of the top lid.