Topic Mapping System for Terminology Standardization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In various domains such as engineering, finance, and accounting, terms used by different users, including professionals and non-professionals, can be redundant, ambiguous, or poorly chosen, leading to inefficient and error-prone processing, especially when trying to organize and map similar concepts.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that identify and map topics within a domain by analyzing terms defined by different users, assigning tokens for relevance, and establishing a similarity value to create a mapping between topics, allowing for the grouping of terms into structured topics and sub-topics, facilitating seamless communication and compliance across different terminologies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If terms are processed without organization and mapping, then processing speed may be maintained, but error rate increases and compliance reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the unorganized term processing task into distinct components: topic identification, term-to-topic assignment, and topic mapping establishment. This segmentation allows each component to be processed independently and systematically, improving reliability without overwhelming the system with monolithic complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary organization by identifying topics and assigning terms to topics before final processing. This preliminary structuring of data reduces errors in subsequent processing steps while maintaining manageable system complexity through staged implementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If multiple terminologies from different users are processed separately, then user-specific accuracy is maintained, but overall processing efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidterminology nuance loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple user terminologies by establishing topic mappings that connect equivalent terms across different user contexts. This combining approach improves overall processing efficiency by allowing standardized topic-based handling while preserving the nuanced meanings through the mapping relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces topics as intermediary concepts that mediate between different user terminologies. These topic mappings serve as a bridge that connects diverse user-specific terms to a common framework, enabling efficient processing without losing the distinctive characteristics of each terminology.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If topic mapping is established with high granularity, then mapping precision improves, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemapping precisionVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by establishing topic mappings at the appropriate level of granularity for each specific domain and context. Rather than uniformly high granularity across all mappings, the system adapts the detail level to local requirements, achieving sufficient precision without unnecessary computational overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11797593B2Mapping of topics within a domain based on terms associated with the topics
Publication Date: 2023.10.24 INTUIT INC
  • US11797593B2 patent drawing
  • US11797593B2 patent drawing
  • US11797593B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for mapping topics. The method includes obtaining terms, obtaining tokens from each term, and identifying a first and a second set of topics. Each of the topics represents one or more of the terms. The method further includes identifying first and second topic names for the first and the second sets of topics. For each topic, the tokens associated with the terms assigned to the topic are analyzed for relevance, and a token with a high relevance is selected as the topic name. The method also includes selecting one of the first and one of the second sets of topics to obtain first and second selected topics, determining, based on the one or more terms, a similarity value between each of the first and the second selected topics, and establishing a mapping between similar first and second selected topics.