Topic-Based Media Recommendation System Using Distance Metrics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mechanisms for recommending media content fail to accurately predict the type of content that users may want to access, leading to overwhelming volumes of available content being poorly matched with user preferences.

Innovation Solution

Systems and methods that identify topics associated with media content, calculate a distance metric for pairs of topics, generate rank-ordered lists, and recommend media content based on these lists to provide personalized recommendations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing mechanisms for recommending media content are used, then the system is simple to operate, but the accuracy of content suggestions is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of content suggestionsVSAvoidcomplexity of recommendation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the recommendation process into distinct modules: topic identification module, distance metric calculation module, rank-ordered list generation module, and recommendation identification module. Each module performs a specific function in analyzing media content and generating recommendations, thereby improving accuracy while maintaining manageable system complexity through functional decomposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary topic-based representation layer between the media content and user preferences. By calculating distance metrics between topics and generating rank-ordered lists as intermediaries, the system achieves more accurate recommendations without requiring direct complex analysis of all media content attributes, thus resolving the accuracy-complexity contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the volume of media content is increased, then the variety of content is improved, but the difficulty of matching content with user preferences increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevariety of contentVSAvoiddifficulty of matching content with user preferences
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts key topics from the vast volume of media content using topic identification algorithms. By taking out and representing content through a limited set of topics, the system maintains the variety of content while simplifying the matching process to user preferences, thereby reducing the difficulty of detecting and measuring user-content alignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the representation parameters of media content from raw content attributes to topic-based abstract representations. This parameter transformation enables the system to handle large volumes of diverse content by mapping them to a manageable topic space, making it easier to measure and match user preferences against the extensive content library.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If personalized recommendations are generated, then the user engagement is improved, but the computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser engagementVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-calculating distance metrics between topics and pre-generating rank-ordered lists during content processing. This preliminary computation stores results that can be quickly retrieved and combined during recommendation generation, significantly reducing the computational resources required for real-time personalized recommendations while maintaining high user engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent ensures continuity of useful action by maintaining topic-based representations and pre-computed metrics across multiple recommendation queries. Rather than performing full recomputation for each recommendation request, the system continuously utilizes pre-established topic relationships and rank-ordered lists, thereby reducing repeated computational overhead while sustaining high-quality personalized recommendations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS9852192B2Methods, systems, and media for recommending media content
Publication Date: 2017.12.26 GOOGLE LLC
  • US9852192B2 patent drawing
  • US9852192B2 patent drawing
  • US9852192B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Mechanisms are provided that: identify topics associated with a plurality of pieces of media content presented in a session; calculate a distance metric for pairs of topics, wherein each of the pairs of topics includes a first topic associated with a first piece of media content and a second topic associated with a second piece of media content, and wherein the second piece of media content was presented within a given span of the presentation of the first piece of media content; for each first topic of the pairs of topics, generate a rank-ordered list for all corresponding second topics; for each of the plurality of pieces of media content, generate a single rank-ordered list of all second topics; and for each of the plurality of pieces of media content, identify one or more other pieces of media content as recommended media content based on the single rank-ordered list.