Topic Redundancy Reduction in Content Browsing Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing content viewing systems face challenges in determining the optimal number of topics for classification, leading to either overly combined or redundant topics, which complicates user understanding and requires computationally intensive quality measures that may not align with user perception.

Innovation Solution

A method is introduced to detect topics associated with content items, generate a set of topics, reduce redundant topics, and create a visualization that includes content items and topics, optimizing relevance and user interaction by focusing on term characterization and soft-clustering algorithms like LDA, to present a user-friendly interface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the number of topics is increased to improve topic differentiation, then topic understanding becomes clearer for users, but the topics appear redundant and the computational burden increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetopic differentiationVSAvoidnumber of topics
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple similar topics into a single representative topic when they share significant overlap in their term distributions. This is achieved by comparing topic similarities and merging topics that exceed a threshold similarity level, thereby reducing redundancy while preserving the essential informational content across related topics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts the number of topics based on similarity thresholds and merging criteria rather than using a fixed number. By changing the parameter of topic count adaptively based on content analysis, the system optimizes between having enough topics for differentiation and few enough to avoid redundancy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the number of topics is decreased to reduce redundancy, then computational intensity is reduced, but some topics become improperly combined making understanding more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidtopic separation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent selectively merges only those topics that demonstrate significant overlap in their term distributions, while preserving topics that maintain meaningful distinctions. This selective merging approach reduces computational burden by eliminating redundant topics without improperly combining distinct topics that should remain separate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual topic number specification with an automated topic merging mechanism that uses similarity comparisons and threshold-based decisions. This substitution allows the system to dynamically determine the optimal number of topics based on actual content characteristics rather than requiring predetermined mechanical settings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If topic quality measures are computed to select optimal topics, then topic quality improves, but the process becomes computationally intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetopic qualityVSAvoidcomputational intensity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines topic detection with automatic merging operations, performing both functions in an integrated process rather than as separate computational stages. This combination reduces overall computational intensity by eliminating redundant computations that would occur if topic quality assessment and topic number optimization were performed separately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements self-service topic optimization where the system automatically adjusts the number of topics based on detected redundancies without requiring external quality measures or manual intervention. The topic merging process is self-regulating, using inherent similarity metrics to determine when and how to combine topics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11080348B2System and method for user-oriented topic selection and browsing
Publication Date: 2021.08.03 FUJIFILM BUSINESS INNOVATION CORP
  • US11080348B2 patent drawing
  • US11080348B2 patent drawing
  • US11080348B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and device for displaying a plurality of content items may be shown. The method may include detecting at least one topic associated with each of the plurality of content items, generating a set of topics based on the at least one topic associated with each of the plurality of content items, the set of topics comprising a number of topics associated with the plurality of content items, reducing the number of topics in the set of topics, by combining one of the number of topic in response to a determination that at least one topic in the set of topics is redundant, and generating a visualization, the visualization including at least one content item from the plurality of content items; and the set of topics.