Topological Graph Generation for Interpretable Relationship Discovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for analyzing large multidimensional datasets are insufficient in identifying important relationships, computationally inefficient, and require sophisticated experts to interpret complex outputs, lacking interactivity and exploratory data analysis capabilities.

Innovation Solution

A method involving metric-lens combinations to generate topological representations, scoring groups based on entropy, and providing interactive visualizations to facilitate understanding of data relationships, allowing for exploratory analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If clustering methods are used to analyze large multidimensional datasets, then data grouping is achieved, but the method is too blunt to identify important relationships

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification precision of relationshipsVSAvoidanalysis method sophistication
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the analysis process into multiple stages: first applying clustering to group data points, then performing detailed relationship analysis within each cluster. This hierarchical segmentation allows the method to handle large datasets efficiently while maintaining the ability to identify important relationships through focused analysis of smaller subsets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different analysis techniques to different regions of the data space. Clustering is applied globally to identify major groups, while more sophisticated relationship detection methods are applied locally within each cluster. This local quality approach ensures important relationships are not missed while avoiding the computational cost of applying complex methods to the entire dataset.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If sophisticated analysis methods are used to identify important relationships, then relationship detection capability is improved, but computational efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelationship identification capabilityVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the computational workload by segmenting the dataset into clusters first. This allows sophisticated analysis methods to be applied to smaller, manageable subsets of data rather than the entire dataset, significantly improving computational efficiency while maintaining relationship detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies full sophisticated analysis only where needed - specifically within identified clusters that contain potential important relationships. For the broader dataset, simpler clustering operations are used. This partial application of complex methods optimizes the balance between relationship detection and computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of operation

If traditional analysis methods are used, then analysis can be performed, but the output requires considerable time for expert interpretation and lacks interactivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterpretation ease and interactivityVSAvoidexpert interpretation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an interactive visualization system as an intermediary between the analysis engine and the end user. This visualization layer translates complex analysis results into intuitive graphical representations that can be explored interactively, eliminating the need for time-consuming expert interpretation while maintaining analytical depth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback loops where user interactions with the visualization immediately trigger re-analysis and updated results. This real-time feedback mechanism allows users to explore data relationships interactively without waiting for expert interpretation, as the system automatically processes and presents new insights based on user queries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Adaptability or versatility

If hypothesis-driven analysis is used, then structured testing is achieved, but exploratory data analysis capability is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexploratory analysis capabilityVSAvoidanalysis methodology structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a dynamic analysis system that can switch between hypothesis-driven and exploratory modes based on user needs. The underlying analytical engine maintains the capability for both structured hypothesis testing and open-ended exploration, adapting its behavior to the specific analytical task at hand rather than being constrained to a single methodology.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent designs a universal analysis framework that can perform multiple functions: hypothesis-driven analysis, exploratory data analysis, clustering, and relationship detection. This multi-functional system eliminates the need to choose between structured and exploratory approaches, as both are supported within the same analytical platform.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250355940A1Outcome analysis for graph generation
Publication Date: 2025.11.20 SYMPHONYAI SENSA LLC
  • US20250355940A1 patent drawing
  • US20250355940A1 patent drawing
  • US20250355940A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An example method includes determining a point from a data set closest to a particular data point using a particular metric and scoring a particular data point based on whether the closest point shares a similar characteristic, selecting a subset of metrics based on the metric score to generate a subset of metrics, evaluating a metric-lens combination by calculating a metric-lens score based on entropy of shared characteristics across subspaces of a reference map generated by the metric-lens combination, selecting a metric-lens combination based on the metric-lens score, generating topological representations using the received data set, associating each node with at least one shared characteristic based on member data points of that particular node sharing the shared characteristic, scoring groups within each topological representation based on entropy, scoring topological representation based on the group scores, and providing a visualization of at least one topological representation based on the graph scores.