Topology-Guided Additive Machining for Defect-Aware Finishing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing additive manufacturing techniques fail to accurately detect material defects during the fabrication process, leading to inefficient and potentially damaging machining processes due to the limitations of mass flux and heat flux measurements, which do not account for topological variations and microstructural differences.

Innovation Solution

An additive manufacturing system equipped with a topology sensor that monitors the build surface during fabrication, providing topological data to a computing device which controls machining parameters to adaptively address defects and variations, ensuring precise and efficient machining.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If mass flux and heat flux measurements are used to monitor fabrication, then the monitoring system is simple, but the detection accuracy of material defects is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracy of material defectsVSAvoidcomplexity of monitoring system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces topology sensors as an intermediary measurement tool that captures surface topography data during fabrication. This intermediary data serves as a bridge between the simple mass/heat flux measurements and the actual material defect detection, enabling indirect detection of defects through surface morphology analysis without requiring complex direct measurement systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces direct mechanical or thermal measurement systems with optical topology sensing. By using optical fields to capture surface topography rather than relying on mass flux or heat flux measurements, the system achieves higher defect detection accuracy while maintaining relative system simplicity through non-contact measurement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If uniform machining parameters are used for the entire build surface, then the machining process is simple, but the machining accuracy for sections with different build quality is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining accuracy for different build quality sectionsVSAvoidcomplexity of machining parameter control
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by dividing the build surface into different zones based on topology data that indicates varying build quality. Each zone is assigned specific machining parameters tailored to its characteristics - for example, sections with poor build quality receive different machining parameters than sections with good build quality, thereby achieving high machining accuracy across heterogeneous surfaces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic machining parameters that adapt to local conditions. Rather than using static uniform parameters, the system continuously adjusts machining parameters based on real-time topology data, creating a dynamic control system that responds to varying build quality across different sections of the build surface

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Loss of information

If topology sensing is added to monitor build surface, then the detection capability is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation about build quality variationsVSAvoidcomplexity of additive manufacturing system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves universality by designing the topology sensing system to serve multiple functions: it monitors build quality, guides machining operations, and provides feedback for process optimization. This multi-functionality justifies the added complexity by extracting maximum value from the sensing capability across different stages of the manufacturing process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback loops where topology sensor data is continuously fed back to control systems that adjust both fabrication and machining parameters. This feedback mechanism transforms the additional sensing complexity into a closed-loop control system that automatically compensates for build variations, thereby reducing information loss and improving overall process quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables more accurate finishing of components by identifying and addressing material defects and variations, improving the integrity and quality of the final product through controlled machining processes.

Implementation Method 1

an energy delivery device configured to deliver energy to a build surface of a component to form a melt pool in the build surface of the component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 2

at least one topology sensor configured to generate topological data representative of a topology of the build surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurface topology measurement:

Data Source

PatentUS20250276377A1Adaptive machining using build surface topology for additive manufacturing systems
Publication Date: 2025.09.04 ROLLS ROYCE PLC
  • US20250276377A1 patent drawing
  • US20250276377A1 patent drawing
  • US20250276377A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An additive manufacturing system includes an energy delivery device configured to deliver energy to a build surface of a component to form a melt pool in the build surface of the component, a powder delivery device configured to direct a powder stream toward the melt pool, a machining device configured to machine the build surface, at least one topology sensor configured to generate topological data representative of a topology of the build surface, and a computing device configured to receive the topological data from the at least one topology sensor for a plurality of layers, identify differences between the topological data and specification data representative of a set of tolerances of the build surface, control the energy delivery device and the powder delivery device based on a set of deposition parameters, and control the machining device to machine the build surface based on the identified differences.