Network Topology Validation for Multi-Chassis Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In multi-chassis information handling systems, validating network topology is challenging due to variations in chassis types and complex connectivity requirements, which can lead to incorrect wiring and rule violations.

Innovation Solution

An information handling system with a processor and memory that determines the connectivity topology among multiple chassis and applies validation rules to ensure correct configuration, using protocols like LLDP and mDNS to extract identifying information and generate graphical representations for user interface feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual topology validation is performed in multi-chassis systems, then flexibility in handling different chassis types is maintained, but errors in connectivity validation and rule violation detection increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetopology validation accuracyVSAvoidvalidation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-validation by automatically discovering its own topology structure and applying validation rules to itself. The console determines connectivity among chassis and validates the topology against predefined rules without requiring external manual intervention, enabling the system to self-correct wiring errors and configuration violations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where topology discovery information is fed back into the validation process. The console repeatedly discovers connectivity, validates against rules, and uses the validation results to guide further topology determination, creating a closed-loop system that progressively refines accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If automated topology discovery protocols like LLDP and mDNS are used, then connectivity detection accuracy improves, but system configuration complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnectivity detection accuracyVSAvoidprotocol integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The console is designed as a universal platform capable of implementing multiple discovery protocols (LLDP, mDNS, and others) within a single system. This multi-functional approach allows the console to handle diverse chassis types and connectivity scenarios using a unified architecture, reducing overall system complexity despite the variety of protocols supported.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The console acts as an intermediary that mediates between various discovery protocols and the topology validation process. It translates protocol-specific data into a unified topology representation that can be validated against rules, simplifying the integration of multiple protocols by providing a common interface layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If comprehensive validation rules are applied to all chassis connections, then topology correctness is ensured, but validation processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetopology correctnessVSAvoidvalidation processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Validation rules are established and configured in advance before topology validation is performed. The system prepares the validation rule set beforehand, so that when topology discovery occurs, the validation process can immediately apply pre-defined rules without requiring complex real-time rule generation or interpretation, reducing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The validation process is segmented into distinct phases: topology discovery, rule application, and error reporting. Each phase handles specific tasks independently, allowing the system to process validation rules efficiently by breaking down the comprehensive validation into manageable segments rather than attempting simultaneous full-system validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10785118B2Systems and methods for network topology validation
Publication Date: 2020.09.22 DELL PROD LP
  • US10785118B2 patent drawing
  • US10785118B2 patent drawing
  • US10785118B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An information handling system may include a processor and a memory coupled to the processor, the memory having program instructions stored thereon that, upon execution by the processor, cause the processor to determine a topology of connectivity of various components of a system comprising multiple information handling system chassis and apply validation rules to the topology to validate the topology.