Welding Torch Consumable Recognition Using Optical Markings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing welding and cutting torches face challenges in accurately and reliably identifying interchangeable consumable components, leading to inefficient operation settings and potential safety risks due to manual adjustments and reliance on costly RFID techniques or unreliable visual identification methods.

Innovation Solution

A torch assembly with imaging devices that optically recognize passive mechanical markings on consumable components, automatically adjusting operational parameters and preventing unsafe or suboptimal operations, while also distinguishing genuine from counterfeit parts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If RFID identification techniques are used to identify interchangeable torch components, then identification reliability is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent identification reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces RFID (electromagnetic) identification with optical imaging and machine vision technology. The system uses an imaging device to capture images of markings on components, and a processor analyzes these images to identify component type, authenticity, and operational parameters. This substitution reduces device complexity and cost while maintaining identification reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses optical copying (imaging) of physical markings on components instead of RFID tags. The imaging device creates visual copies of barcodes, data matrices, or other markings, which are then processed to extract identification information. This approach eliminates the need for expensive RFID hardware while achieving reliable component recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Device complexity

If pressure decay measurement techniques are used to identify components, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision and reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidcomponent identification precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces pressure decay measurement (mechanical/physical measurement) with optical imaging and image processing. Instead of measuring pressure changes over time, the system captures images of component markings and uses machine vision to identify component characteristics. This provides immediate, precise identification without the delays and inaccuracies of pressure-based methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If visual identification methods are used to recognize components, then device complexity is minimized, but measurement precision and reliability worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidcomponent recognition accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automatic self-identification of components through optical markings. The imaging device and processor work together to automatically read markings on components, determine component type and authenticity, and configure operational parameters without human intervention. This eliminates the limitations of manual visual identification while keeping the system simple and cost-effective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enhances basic visual identification by incorporating machine vision technology. The system uses algorithms to automatically analyze images of component markings, extract identification information, and make decisions about component authenticity and suitability. This transforms simple visual inspection into a precise, automated recognition system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of operation

If manual adjustment of power supply settings is required for different components, then ease of operation deteriorates, but device complexity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational convenienceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automatic feedback control for power supply settings. The imaging device identifies the installed component, the processor determines the appropriate operational parameters, and the power supply automatically adjusts its settings accordingly. This closed-loop feedback system eliminates manual adjustment while maintaining simple operation for the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides self-service by automatically configuring power supply parameters based on component identification. When a component is installed, the system autonomously reads its markings, determines the required operational settings, and adjusts the power supply without user intervention. This eliminates the need for users to manually consult manuals or adjust settings, greatly improving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures seamless transitions between operations, enhances safety and efficiency by automatically setting optimal parameters, reduces costs through inexpensive marking techniques, and prevents misuse of unsuitable components.

Implementation Method 1

The one or more imaging devices are disposed within the internal cavity and are positioned to optically acquire an image or image data representative of the one or more markings included on the one or more interchangeable torch components

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical imaging: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS11883896B2Recognition of components for welding and cutting torches
Publication Date: 2024.01.30 ESAB GROUP INC
  • US11883896B2 patent drawing
  • US11883896B2 patent drawing
  • US11883896B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Recognizing interchangeable torch components, such as consumables, for welding and cutting torches includes determining that one or more interchangeable torch components installed in an operative end of a torch are genuine. Operational parameters for the one or more interchangeable torch components can also be determined. When the one or more interchangeable torch components are determined to be genuine, an indicator assembly can be activated to provide a first indication. When the operational parameters are implemented at a power supply connected to the torch, the indicator assembly can be activated to provide a second indication.