Torque Converter Damper Layout for Compact Torsional Vibration Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional torque converters with anti-resonance dampers face challenges in reducing production costs, minimizing installation space, and improving damping performance due to increased radial size and complex shapes, which limit the size of the inertial mass and result in insufficient damping performance.

Innovation Solution

The torque converter design simplifies the structure by directly installing an inertial mass on an intermediate member radially outside the damper spring, using the turbine shell as an inertial mass, and incorporating a ring-shaped mass plate configuration with additional mass and a connecting bracket to enhance damping performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If an anti-resonance damper is disposed radially outside the outer coil spring, then damping performance is improved, but the radial size of the torque converter is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamping performanceVSAvoidradial size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions the anti-resonance damper from a radial arrangement to an axial arrangement. The inertial mass is positioned axially outside the outer coil spring rather than radially outside, changing the spatial dimension of placement. This allows the damper components to be stacked in the axial direction, maintaining damping performance while reducing radial footprint and overall torque converter size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Volume of stationary object

If the occupied space of the dynamic damper is limited, then the overall size is reduced, but it is difficult to secure sufficient size for the inertial mass body, resulting in insufficient inertial force and damping performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverall sizeVSAvoidinertial force
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the inertial mass adjustable by providing a through-hole that allows insertion of adjustment members (such as weights or adjustable plugs). This enables the inertial mass to be dynamically adjusted after assembly, allowing optimization of inertial force within limited space. The adjustable design ensures sufficient damping performance can be achieved even with compact dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of manufacture

If the anti-resonance damper is configured to radially extend from the outer end of the output member, then connection is achieved, but the shape of the output member becomes complicated and manufacturing cost is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidshape complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the connection function from the output member by introducing a dedicated connecting member (such as a connecting plate or bracket) that separately performs the connection task. This allows the output member to maintain a simple, standard shape while the connecting member provides the necessary connection interface for the anti-resonance damper, reducing overall manufacturing complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If a connecting member is used to connect the inertial mass to the output member, then connection is achieved, but the structure becomes complicated and production cost is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection reliabilityVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the inertial mass directly with the intermediate member by providing a through-hole in the intermediate member for direct insertion and fixation of the inertial mass. This integration eliminates the need for separate connecting members, reducing structural complexity while maintaining reliable connection. The inertial mass becomes an integral part of the damper assembly, simplifying both structure and manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design reduces production costs, minimizes the overall size of the torque converter, and significantly improves damping performance by optimizing the placement and utilization of inertial mass within the existing space.

Implementation Method 1

a first damper spring and a second damper spring elastically connecting the input member and the output member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

an anti-resonance damper in which an inertial mass is installed on a torque transmission path

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertia: Inertia

Data Source

PatentUS12013019B2Torque converter
Publication Date: 2024.06.18 VALEO KAPEC CO LTD
  • US12013019B2 patent drawing
  • US12013019B2 patent drawing
  • US12013019B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a torque converter that may reduce production cost by a simple structure compared to the conventional art, reduce the overall size of the torque converter by minimizing an installation space of an anti-resonance damper, and improve damping performance.