Torque Transmission Joint With Variable Rigidity Coupling
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing torque-transmission systems, such as those in electric power steering devices, face challenges in smoothly transmitting torque between drive and driven shafts with mismatched central axes and often generate abnormal noises due to backlash in spline engagement parts.
Innovation Solution
A torque-transmission joint with a coupling having convex and concave portions on its circumferential surfaces, where the circumferential rigidity of axial end portions is lower than the intermediate portion, allowing for elastic deformation and oscillation to align the shafts, and a preload mechanism to prevent noise by elastically pressing the worm towards the worm wheel.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Ease of operation
If the central axes of the drive shaft and driven shaft are mismatched, then torque transmission becomes difficult, but making the coupling rigid prevents accommodation of axis misalignment
Solution Approach 1:
The coupling employs different rigidity characteristics in different regions: the axial end portions have lower circumferential rigidity to allow elastic deformation and accommodate axis misalignment, while the axially intermediate portion maintains higher rigidity for stable torque transmission. This local differentiation of mechanical properties resolves the contradiction between needing flexibility for alignment and rigidity for transmission stability.
Solution Approach 2:
The coupling transitions from a static rigid structure to a dynamic elastic structure that can oscillate and adapt to axis misalignment. The varying circumferential rigidity enables the coupling to dynamically adjust its shape during operation, allowing the axial end portions to deform elastically while the intermediate portion maintains structural integrity for torque transmission.
2Object-affected harmful factors
If elastic members are used to press the worm towards the worm wheel to suppress gear-tooth striking sound, then meshed part noise is reduced, but abnormal noise occurs at the coupled part between output shaft and worm
Solution Approach 1:
The coupling applies local quality differentiation by having the axial end portions with lower circumferential rigidity specifically at the regions that contact the drive shaft and driven shaft. This localized softness allows these end portions to elastically deform and oscillate, absorbing shocks and preventing abnormal noise at the coupled parts, while the stiffer intermediate portion ensures proper worm engagement.
Solution Approach 2:
The elastic axial end portions act as beforehand cushioning elements that absorb and dampen shocks before they can propagate to the coupled parts. By designing the coupling with lower rigidity at the axial ends, the patent preemptively cushions the impact between the spline engagement parts and the worm, preventing abnormal noise generation.
3Stability of the object's composition
If circumferential rigidity is increased throughout the coupling to prevent oscillation, then alignment stability improves, but torque transmission smoothness deteriorates due to inability to accommodate misalignment
Solution Approach 1:
The coupling employs different rigidity characteristics in different regions: the axial end portions have lower circumferential rigidity to allow elastic deformation and accommodate axis misalignment, while the axially intermediate portion maintains higher rigidity for stable torque transmission. This local differentiation of mechanical properties resolves the contradiction between needing flexibility for alignment and rigidity for transmission stability.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
This configuration enables smooth torque transmission between mismatched shafts while preventing abnormal noises by ensuring proper alignment and contact without strong collisions, enhancing durability and reducing manufacturing costs.
Implementation Method 1
the circumferential rigidity of both axial end portions of each coupling-side convex portion is lower than circumferential rigidity of an axially intermediate portion, so that both axial end portions are elastically deformed
Implementation Method 2
a preload mechanism configured to elastically press the worm towards the worm wheel
Data Source
AI summary
Circumferential rigidity of both axial end portions of each coupling-side convex portion is lower than circumferential rigidity of an axially intermediate portion of each coupling-side convex portion. The drive-side concave-convex portion is engaged with a half portion on the other axial side of the coupling-side concave-convex portion. The driven-side concave-convex portion is engaged with a half portion on one axial side of the coupling-side concave-convex portion.


