Torque Reaction Engine Underwater Propulsion Eliminates Hull Penetrations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional underwater craft face challenges with drive shaft penetrations through the hull, leading to leakage, friction, and reduced operating depth due to the need for complex seals and decreased efficiency when flooded with oil.

Innovation Solution

The use of torque reaction engines (TREs) secured within a pressure vessel eliminates the need for hull penetrations by accelerating thrust fluid through cyclic oscillation of a central shaft, reducing friction and leakage, and allowing operation without the need for labyrinth seals or oil flooding.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If drive shaft penetrations are used to transmit power to underwater craft, then power transmission is achieved, but leakage and friction occur reducing reliability and efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower transmissionVSAvoidleakage and friction
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the drive shaft penetration from the hull structure entirely. Instead of transmitting mechanical power through the hull, the system uses a pressure vessel containing a torque reaction engine that generates thrust internally, eliminating the need for external drive shafts and their associated seals and lubrication systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical drive shaft transmission system with a torque reaction engine system. The torque reaction engine uses cyclic oscillation of a central shaft to accelerate thrust fluid, converting mechanical power generation into a reaction-based system that does not require hull penetrations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If complex seals and oil flooding are used to prevent leakage, then sealing is improved, but device complexity and maintenance requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing performanceVSAvoidseals and lubrication systems
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the entire sealing and lubrication subsystem from the craft design. By eliminating drive shaft penetrations, the complex array of labyrinth seals, grease fittings, and oil flooding systems are completely removed, simplifying the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The pressure vessel containing the torque reaction engine creates a self-contained system that does not require external sealing mechanisms. The system is designed to operate without external lubrication or sealing interventions, making it self-sufficient and maintenance-free regarding sealing components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Power

If drive shaft penetrations are used, then power transmission to propellers is achieved, but operating depth is reduced due to seal limitations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower transmission to propellersVSAvoidoperating depth
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes the depth-limited drive shaft system with a torque reaction engine system that is not constrained by seal depth limitations. The torque reaction engine generates thrust through internal cyclic oscillation, allowing the craft to operate at greater depths without the mechanical constraints of sealed drive shafts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

By removing the drive shaft penetration system, the patent eliminates the primary constraint on operating depth. Without seals that degrade under pressure, the craft can operate at significantly greater depths where conventional sealed drive shafts would fail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances the operating range and efficiency of underwater craft by eliminating drive train friction and leakage issues, enabling deeper and more efficient operation without the drawbacks of conventional drive shaft seals.

Implementation Method 1

accelerating thrust fluid through cyclic oscillation of a central shaft

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCyclic oscillation: Harmonic Oscillator

Implementation Method 2

torque reaction engines (TREs) secured within a pressure vessel eliminates the need for hull penetrations by accelerating thrust fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTorque reaction: Reaction (physics)

Data Source

PatentUS12151788B2Robotic fish with multiple torque reaction engines
Publication Date: 2024.11.26 FISHBOAT INC
  • US12151788B2 patent drawing
  • US12151788B2 patent drawing
  • US12151788B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A robotic fish comprises one or more torque reaction engines and a fish body, wherein the torque reaction engine cyclically oscillates and causes a wave to propagate across the fish body, including through a flexible wing, accelerating thrust fluid and propelling the robotic fish.