Torque Support Bearing Core Deformation for Engine Roll Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing torque supports for drive motors in vehicles require larger openings in the vehicle chassis, which weakens the structure, increases weight, and production costs due to multiple components, and complicates assembly.

Innovation Solution

A torque support design using a single-piece bearing core with a recess and notch, allowing resilient or plastic deformation for improved clamping and reduced component count, simplifying assembly and reducing engine roll.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a torque support uses multiple bearing cores and bearing bushes, then the clamping action is improved, but the device complexity increases and assembly time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclamping actionVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple bearing cores and bearing bushes into a single integrated bearing unit. The bearing unit comprises a single bearing core with multiple bearing bushes arranged around it, eliminating the need for separate bearing cores and reducing the total number of components while maintaining the clamping function through the resilient deformation of the bearing bushes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The bearing core is designed with multiple bearing bushes that can deform independently, allowing each bush to contribute to the clamping action on different sides of the support member. This segmentation of the bearing function within a single core maintains effective clamping while reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If a torque support uses multiple bearing cores, then the clamping action is improved, but the assembly time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclamping actionVSAvoidassembly time
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

By integrating multiple bearing bushes around a single bearing core, the patent reduces the number of separate components that need to be positioned and assembled. The single bearing unit can be installed as one piece, significantly reducing assembly time compared to assembling multiple separate bearing cores and bushes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The bearing bushes are pre-positioned around the bearing core during manufacturing, creating a pre-assembled bearing unit. This preliminary arrangement of components eliminates the need for complex on-site assembly of multiple bearing parts, reducing assembly time while maintaining the multi-directional clamping capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If larger openings are used in the vehicle chassis for torque support, then the torque support can be accommodated, but the vehicle structure is weakened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodation of torque supportVSAvoidvehicle structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs resilient bearing bushes that deform in multiple directions to accommodate the support member. This multi-dimensional deformation capability allows the bearing unit to adapt to the support member without requiring large openings in the vehicle chassis, thereby maintaining structural integrity while providing necessary accommodation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design reduces production costs, simplifies assembly, and provides effective clamping action to minimize engine roll by using a single bearing core with a deformable connection web, allowing for a more stable and compact torque support.

Implementation Method 1

the second core portion can be displaced relative to the first core portion by resilient deformation of the connection web

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResilient deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a bearing core surrounded by a bearing bush

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResilience: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS9242542B2System for reducing engine roll
Publication Date: 2016.01.26 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US9242542B2 patent drawing
  • US9242542B2 patent drawing
  • US9242542B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for an engine torque support is described comprising a support member connected to a vehicle structure at a first end via a bearing comprising a bearing core surrounded by a bearing bush. The bearing bush has a recess, and the bearing core includes a receiving channel for a connector, a notch extending transversely relative to the receiving channel, and a connection web formed in a plane of the notch creating a first core portion, and a second core portion of the bearing core. The second core portion is spaced apart from the first core portion by the notch, and the second core portion is displaced relative to the first core portion via resilient deformation of the connection web and/or via breaking of the connection web.