Torque Suppressor for Guitar Neck Dive Neutralization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Musical instruments, especially guitar-like instruments, experience neck dive and neck yaw due to uncomfortable weight distribution when held with a shoulder strap, leading to muscle strain and interference with playing techniques.

Innovation Solution

A torque suppressor providing a rigid, adjustable three-point support system that allows the shoulder strap to attach to the instrument at various locations, including the headstock and body, neutralizing neck dive and yaw while allowing for 'over-the-board' playing without obstruction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a shoulder strap is used to hold the instrument, then the instrument can be carried conveniently, but the weight distribution becomes uncomfortable causing neck dive and muscle strain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstrument carrying convenienceVSAvoidneck dive and muscle strain
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides the single shoulder strap support system into a three-point support system with a shoulder strap attached to the body, a neck strap attached to the headstock, and a rigid extension connecting them. This segmentation allows independent adjustment of each strap to achieve proper weight distribution and eliminate neck dive.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The rigid extension acts as an intermediary element that connects the shoulder strap and neck strap, transferring and distributing the instrument's weight between the two attachment points. This mediator enables the three-point support system to function as a unified structure that balances the instrument's center of gravity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If strap buttons are used to attach the shoulder strap, then the strap can be easily attached, but the strap may slip off due to friction variations and design differences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrap attachment easeVSAvoidstrap connection stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces static friction-based strap button connections with dynamic locking mechanisms including strap locks and a rigid extension with attachment points designed to prevent slippage. These mechanisms actively maintain connection stability regardless of friction variations or design differences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If the shoulder strap attaches at fixed points on the instrument body, then the attachment is simple, but the player cannot adjust the instrument position for comfort or technique

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment system simplicityVSAvoidinstrument position adjustability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The rigid extension incorporates adjustable components including a telescoping mechanism with multiple length positions and rotatable joints that allow the extension to adapt to different instrument geometries and player preferences. This enables dynamic adjustment of the three-point support configuration while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The rigid extension serves multiple functions: it connects the shoulder strap and neck strap, provides structural support, enables position adjustment, and adapts to different instrument types. This multi-functionality replaces the need for multiple separate adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If a rigid extension is added to create three-point support, then neck dive is neutralized, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneck dive neutralizationVSAvoidsupport system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention combines the shoulder strap, neck strap, and rigid extension into an integrated three-point support system that functions as a unified structure. This merging eliminates the need for separate adjustment mechanisms and reduces overall system complexity while achieving neck dive neutralization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS9257110B1Torque suppressor
Publication Date: 2016.02.09 SMITH GORDON S
  • US9257110B1 patent drawing
  • US9257110B1 patent drawing
  • US9257110B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a torque suppressor for bodies having a forward assembly comprising an extension having a rear-portion, a mid-portion, and a fore-portion, wherein the fore-portion is configured to attach to the forward assembly, the rear-portion is configured to attach to the body at a forward point of attachment, and the mid-portion is configured to attach to a first end of a shoulder strap, the shoulder strap having a second end configured to attach to a rear point of attachment of the body. The device is effective in eliminating neck dive.