Torque Vectoring Machine Vibration Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Resonance vibrations in vehicle drivelines caused by torque vectoring in electrically propelled vehicles lead to increased noise and vibrations, outweighing the benefits of torque vectoring.

Innovation Solution

Adjusting the torque output of a torque vectoring electric machine based on the speed difference between the actual wheel speed and the machine's speed to reduce resonance vibrations, without the need for mechanical dampeners.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If torque vectoring electric machine is activated to transfer torque between wheels, then torque utilization efficiency is improved, but resonance vibrations and noise in driveline increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque utilization efficiencyVSAvoiddriveline resonance vibrations
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies vibration control by actively managing the oscillations in the driveline. The controller monitors vibration levels and adjusts the torque vectoring electric machine operation to minimize resonance vibrations while maintaining torque transfer functionality. This allows the system to benefit from torque vectoring while suppressing harmful vibrations through controlled mechanical vibration management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #18Mechanical vibration

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes operating parameters of the torque vectoring electric machine based on detected vibration conditions. The controller adjusts torque magnitude, frequency, and phase parameters dynamically to avoid resonant frequencies and reduce vibration amplitude. This parameter adaptation allows the system to maintain torque transfer efficiency while operating outside harmful resonance zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-generated harmful factors

If mechanical dampeners are installed to reduce vibrations, then driveline noise is reduced, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriveline noiseVSAvoidmechanical dampener installation
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical dampeners with an electronic control system that uses the torque vectoring electric machine to actively counteract vibrations. Instead of adding passive mechanical vibration suppression components, the system uses electronic torque modulation to achieve vibration reduction. This substitution eliminates the need for additional mechanical dampeners while maintaining vibration control effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The torque vectoring electric machine serves dual functions: torque transfer and vibration suppression. The same motor used for torque vectoring is controlled to generate counter-vibrations that cancel harmful resonances. This self-service approach allows the existing component to handle multiple functions without requiring separate vibration control mechanisms, thereby reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11085516B2Methods and system for operating a torque vectoring electric machine
Publication Date: 2021.08.10 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US11085516B2 patent drawing
  • US11085516B2 patent drawing
  • US11085516B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are provided for operating a vehicle that includes a torque vectoring electric machine. In one example, torque output of a torque vectoring electric machine is adjusted to reduce driveline torque disturbances when the torque vectoring electric machine is activated. The torque output is adjusted in response to a speed difference between a wheel speed and a speed of the torque vectoring electric machine.