Torque Vectoring Yaw Equalization via Steering Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electrically driven vehicles with torque vectoring drives face issues of inadvertent yaw torque due to production-related variations in electrical parameters, leading to safety concerns and tire wear, which existing solutions address inadequately, especially over the lifetime of the drive.

Innovation Solution

A method and system utilizing data from steering torque and position sensors to automatically equalize yaw torque by adapting target torque demands in a closed loop during straight-ahead travel, accounting for differences in electric machine properties and changes over time, ensuring equal actual torques on both wheels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If production-related grading of electric machines is implemented to counteract variation, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity and production time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectric machine uniformityVSAvoidproduction process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit automatically detects and compensates for torque differences between electric machines during operation, eliminating the need for manual grading and adaptation processes. The system self-adjusts by adapting target torque values based on measured steering torque deviations, making the production process simpler while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the target torque parameter dynamically to compensate for production variations. By adapting target torque values for individual electric machines based on measured deviations, the system compensates for manufacturing differences without requiring physical regrading or complex production processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If software model adaptation is used to equalize drives, then manufacturing precision is improved, but productivity decreases due to time-consuming processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrive equalization accuracyVSAvoidproduction speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of torque differences during a brief straight-ahead travel phase, then immediately applies compensation. This quick preliminary action eliminates the need for time-consuming manual adaptation processes while maintaining high precision in drive equalization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit continuously monitors steering torque and uses this feedback to automatically adjust target torque values for the electric machines. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables rapid compensation of drive differences without manual intervention, significantly improving production productivity while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If torque control without regulation is implemented, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability decreases due to inadvertent yaw torque

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system simplicityVSAvoidvehicle safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit introduces a simple feedback mechanism that monitors steering torque during straight-ahead travel and automatically adjusts target torque values to eliminate yaw torque. This minimal feedback addition maintains system simplicity while dramatically improving reliability and vehicle safety by preventing inadvertent yaw torque.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex mechanical grading and adaptation mechanisms with an electronic control solution. By using electronic sensing and control to detect and compensate for torque differences, the system maintains simplicity while improving reliability compared to mechanical equalization methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Manufacturing precision

If grading and adaptation processes are implemented, then production-related variation is reduced, but loss of time and increased costs occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectric machine uniformityVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit automatically performs detection and compensation of torque differences during vehicle operation, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual grading and adaptation processes in the production line. This self-service approach reduces production time while maintaining manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses dynamic parameter adaptation of target torque values to compensate for production variations, replacing static pre-grading processes. This allows for quick electronic adjustment without the time-consuming physical grading and adaptation procedures, significantly reducing production time while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11312354B2Torque vectoring having automatic yaw torque equalization
Publication Date: 2022.04.26 AUDI AG
  • US11312354B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and a system for automatic yaw torque equalization (AYTE) in an electrically driven vehicle having wheel-individual torque distribution (torque vectoring drive).